Bug#283005: ispCP debian package

2007-06-19 Thread Robert Millan [ackstorm]
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 03:41:20PM -0500, Raphael wrote: > > I'm not sure about this, but I think DD's won't like upgrade stuff > from a package that never existed in the Debian rep to a new coming > one. That sounds perfectly reasonable to me. Specially if there has been a debian package around

Bug#381727: linuxbios ITP

2007-07-23 Thread Robert Millan [ackstorm]
Hi Uwe, This ITP looks quite old. Are you still working on this? I would like a linuxbios package with an image that can be used with qemu. I'm not sure if you're targetting qemu (and bochs/etc) only or real hardware builds (is the latter feasible for debian?). But in either case, we can work

Bug#381727: linuxbios ITP

2007-07-23 Thread Robert Millan [ackstorm]
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 01:06:29PM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote: > Yep, good point. I'll see to have a package ready in a few days. Good. Let me know if you can use some help. > I definately want to ship a QEMU target, sure. > > The hardware targets could also make sense in LinuxBIOSv3, as there is

Bug#283005: VHCS debian package

2006-07-13 Thread Robert Millan [ackstorm]
It seems there's a package available already: http://vhcs.puuhis.net/wiki/index.php/Getting_started http://apt.scunc.it/pool/sarge/main/v/vhcs/ Very complete, with debconfiscated setup, etc. Hendrik, do you have plans for getting this into the official archive? -- Robert Millan ACK STOR

Bug#388701: beryl in xorg.conf

2007-02-23 Thread Robert Millan [ackstorm]
FYI: #412069 This Works For Me [tm], but I thought you might want to drop some commments. -- Robert Millan ACK STORM, S.L. - http://www.ackstorm.es/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#383934: VHCS debian package

2007-06-05 Thread Robert Millan [ackstorm]
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 12:41:51PM -0300, Dererk wrote: > > Thanks for answering so soon, Hendrik! > > I agree 100% with you, there's no sense in risking everyone with a no > longer maintained soft, I didn't even known this fork existed. > > Fortunately it's in heavy development, and, as you men