Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-07-28 Thread Michael Niedermayer
>>>testing either. I am therefore surprised about the given answer to the > >> > >>"More than uncomfortable" does not mean "will not be included" > > > >Yes, it does. > > > >Someone will have to convince the security team someh

Bug#729203: Packaging for FFmpeg avoiding conflicts with libav

2014-02-25 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:33:33PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:30:25PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > > On 25.02.2014 22:18, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 06:23:20PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > No, it means I don't have the tim

Bug#729203: Packaging for FFmpeg avoiding conflicts with libav

2014-02-25 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 05:57:02PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 11:36:36PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > > Hi Moritz, > > > > On 23.02.2014 22:56, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > >I don't have the time nor the interest to discuss this at length, so > > >EOD from my si

Bug#729203: Packaging for FFmpeg avoiding conflicts with libav

2014-02-27 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 04:49:09PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 02:30:47AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > Yes, it's the latter: I didn't badmouth ffmpeg in any way: it was said > > > that libav > > > fixed less Googl