Otavio Salvador @ 2005-08-24 (Wednesday), 14:09 (-0300)
> Hello,
Good evening,
> I'm really interested to have spca5xx include on Debian and, if you
> want, help you to maintain it. I have a ready patch to it to include
> my webcam support and already sent it to upstream too.
>
> If you don't ha
[ubuntu maintainer Cc:ed]
Good morning, (kind of)
Is there any progress on this?
If it is of any help, ubuntu packages now seem to be available at:
http://ziemia.ath.cx/~at/dev/ubuntu.html
Maybe some joined effort could be worked out? No source debs published
there though, as far as I can see.
Stephen Birch @ 2005-09-05 (Monday), 00:30 (-0700)
> [snip]
>
> I propose a compromise. If for some reason my NM is not complete two
> months from now I'll contact you again and send you the package with a
> sponsorship request. That way the package will be in Debian for at
> least a year before
Alliance team,
I'm a debian user who recently found your software. Beeing a user I'm more
interested in using software than compiling and setting it up.
As noted in Debian's bug tracking system there is interest in including
alliance in the distribution but it's stalled because of questions abo
Package: wnpp
* Package name: kernel-patch-v4l2-2.4
Version : 2.4.26-1
Upstream Author : Gerd Knorr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://dl.bytesex.org/patches/
* License : GPL
Description : video4linux2 patch against 2.4 kernels
For the reason that I need
A fair while ago I consulted debian-legal on the public domain license
and got the polite reply from Glenn Maynard stating that problems
might exist with it not disclaiming warranty.
Further discussion with upstream created this short license:
Netbiff may be redistributed in any form without
To document stuff this is what happens when trying to apply the
individual patches. (Needless to say the big file gets a few rejects)
It seems like trouble exists with:
10-scsi-media-changer-2.4.26.diff.gz
32_bttv-2.4.26.diff.gz
I have not investigated why.
leka% patch -p1 <
/us
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 01:16:37PM +0200, Martin Samuelsson wrote:
> It seems like trouble exists with:
> 10-scsi-media-changer-2.4.26.diff.gz
> 32_bttv-2.4.26.diff.gz
The first patch is obviously already applied according to
/usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.26/README.Debian
In
(Resending this since my Cc to debial-legal got lost the first time)
A fair while ago I consulted debian-legal on the public domain license
and got the polite reply from Glenn Maynard stating that problems
might exist with it not disclaiming warranty.
Further discussion with upstream created this
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:12:39PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Martin Samuelsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.04.13.1938 +0200]:
> > Is there a guide somewhere on how to create kernel-patch packages?
>
> Nope, until I find the time... the dh-kpatches package m
A few minutes ago I successfully compiled a spca5xx module. Having to do
it manually though is not the optimal solution and I would love to see a
package for Debian.
Is there anything I can do to help bringing spca5xx-modules-source into
existance? Please let me know in that case!
--
/Martin
--
[Keeping all Cc:s, but feel free to ignore this mail if desired]
Stephen Birch @ 2005-05-24 (Tuesday), 07:29 (-0700)
> > A few minutes ago I successfully compiled a spca5xx module. Having to do
> > it manually though is not the optimal solution and I would love to see a
> > package for Debian.
>
I'm a new user of player/stage and tried out the Debian packages of it I
found. However, I did encounter some problems. :(
First of all, when trying to download the Debianized source trees, it seems
like the one for stage does not exist. For player it works perfectly, but with
stage I get errors l
Yannick Brosseau @ 2005-05-27 (Friday), 10:09 (-0400)
> Thanks for reporting, I forgot to upload the stage.orig.tar.gz file.
> You should be able to download it correctly now.
Thanks! I managed to get a little longer with that file. However, I
realized that the versions weren't exactly bleeding e
Martin Samuelsson @ 2005-10-19 (Wednesday), 18:15 (+0200)
> I've now updated my installation to player 1.6.5 and stage 2.0.0a, and
> had to make a few modifications.
For some reason my player/stage installation does no longer start. In my
attempts to rebuild it and reinstall, I cle
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
After many years as a user I intend to becoming a maintainer and
contribute back to debian.
One of the programs I use that is not yet a part of debian is netbiff.
Upstream is made aware of my intentions and has a positive attitude
about having his software include
Dear knowledge source,
As can be seen in #294559 I hope to become a debian developer. In the
same bug report one can see that the package I'd like to start with is
netbiff.
According to it's web page the license is:
"
License
All code contained in netbiff is released into the public domain.
"
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 11:38:47PM +0100, Marcin Wiacek wrote:
> * 2004 was time of marking Gammu source with (c) issues. I don't know how
> it's estimated by Debian developers, but one of them said, that it would be
> possible to put Gammu in Debian after applying all proposed changes. It was
> do
Franz Hirschbeck @ 2005-10-03 (Monday), 15:24 (+0200)
> You shouldn't mix up an ubuntu repository with a debian installation, unless
> you know exactly what you are doing. Maybe you can find a repository where
> network manager for debian/sarge is offered otherwise you may run into
> dependency
Martin Samuelsson @ 2005-05-30 (Monday), 13:01 (+0200)
> Yannick Brosseau @ 2005-05-27 (Friday), 10:09 (-0400)
> > Thanks for reporting, I forgot to upload the stage.orig.tar.gz file.
> > You should be able to download it correctly now.
>
> Thanks! I managed to get a little
Luciano Bello @ 2005-08-30 (Tuesday), 21:40 (-0300)
> El sáb, 27-08-2005 a las 10:24 +0200, Martin Samuelsson escribió:
> > Is there any progress on this?
>
> I had some time problems... but probably the next week. :D
Could you please post to the bug report if the problems
21 matches
Mail list logo
