Bug#516351: see/seetxt 0.61

2009-07-13 Thread MK
> I've noticed you are managing the version number as if it was a > float. Yeah, I was not aware of this issue at all. It's all the same to me, so I could make the next one 0.6.2, or else 0.70. I thought the debian package was going to be called seetxt, you may have to bug Joop about that as

Bug#516351: see/seetxt 0.61

2009-07-15 Thread MK
On 07/14/2009 02:36:27 PM, Guillem Jover wrote: > That should not be a problem, renaming the source package afterwards > does > not imply major work, just few strings changed here and there. I just noticed the other day that using "no confirm" in the config file does not work unless the line is

Bug#516351: ITP: see -- lightweight Linux text file and manpage viewer

2009-03-02 Thread MK
Mark Eriksen (the upstream author) here. My desire for the binary and package name would be "seetxt", which I have not been able to find any conflicts by googling. I will probably then also use a softlink to the binary, "seeman", which shouldn't conflict either. Regarding portability: GN

Bug#516351: ITP: see -- lightweight Linux text file and manpage viewer

2009-03-03 Thread MK
On 03/03/2009 08:25:22 AM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: -> MK wrote: -> > I -> > have not been able to find any conflicts by googling. -> > -> -> IMO, the best way to find conflicts is to use apt-file, not google. Thanks for that. I actually use fedora! (no real prefer

Bug#516351: (no subject)

2009-03-03 Thread MK
Just a note: The -m switch may cause a problem if you try a non-existent manpage on a non-english system. I have discussed this with Joop a bit and the next version should work everywhere. I'll wait until we have agreed upon the name and then update the site. Mark Eriksen -- To UNSUB

Bug#516351: see update

2009-03-09 Thread MK
Here's what's going on: 0.54 is done, I just have to test it for a few days and redo parts of the man page. The changes are: -the package name will remain "see", but the executable will be seetxt, with a softlink from seeman for loading man pages. -the man page check now uses the return value o

Bug#516351: see update

2009-03-10 Thread MK
On 03/09/2009 02:25:29 PM, Joop Stakenborg wrote: > I will see the freshmeat announcement when it's ready. I will be away > most of next week but will start working on it when I get back. Great, I will take a bit more time to tinker with this, then. I was using it in GNOME via lenny*, and deci

Bug#516351: update

2009-03-20 Thread MK
I have added about 30% to the codebase while playing with see in lenny, which is very different than my normal environment -- mostly new features and improved functionality. I am still testing it and will release it as version 0.6 sometime this weekend. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wn

Bug#516351: update

2009-03-23 Thread MK
e javascript? I will add some kind of short web "intro to see" later this week, trying to demonstrate how I envision it's use particularly under GNOME. --MK -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#516351: copyright and license refinement

2009-03-27 Thread MK
At the request/recommendation of someone at "Savannah" I have added some more explicit copyright and licensing info, qv. https://savannah.gnu.org/task/?9211 The code remains the same so I have not incremented the version. The tarballs via www.intergate.com/~halfcountplus/see/ seetxt.sourceforg