b/debian/patches/CodecID.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+Description: Rename CodecID to AVCodecID
+
+Author: Andreas Cadhalpun
+Last-Update: <2014-07-29>
+
+--- bombono-dvd-1.2.2.orig/src/mgui/ffviewer.cpp
bombono-dvd-1.2.2/src/mgui/ffviewer.cpp
+@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ C_LINKAGE_BEGIN
+
Control: user debian-le...@lists.debian.org
Control: usertags -1 one-copyright-review
Hi,
zfs-linux has been waiting in the NEW queue for more than 11 months,
which is rather long.
In order to help the ftp-masters processing the NEW queue[1], I have
reviewed the debian/copyright file of zfs-
user debian-le...@lists.debian.org
usertags 683746 one-copyright-review
thanks
Hi,
rspamd has been waiting in the NEW queue for more than 4 months, which
is rather long.
In order to help the ftp-masters processing the NEW queue[1], I have
reviewed the debian/copyright file of rspamd followin
user debian-le...@lists.debian.org
usertags 735884 one-copyright-review
thanks
Hi,
ocp-indent has been waiting in the NEW queue for more than 5 months,
which is rather long.
In order to help the ftp-masters processing the NEW queue[1], I have
reviewed the debian/copyright file of ocp-indent
user debian-le...@lists.debian.org
usertags 729203 copyright-review-requested
thanks
Hi Charles,
On 06.08.2014 13:55, Charles Plessy wrote:
A few years ago, I made a proposal for peer-reviewing copyright files in the
NEW queue.
https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReview
The goal is not to s
On 08.08.2014 12:05, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
On Aug 8, 2014, at 1:29 AM, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
For this task I obtained the sources from
https://github.com/zfsonlinux/pkg-spl, branch master/ubuntu/precise, which
seems to contain the most recent changes.
That is the code for the SPL
Hi,
On 08.08.2014 15:07, Vsevolod Stakhov wrote:
On 08/08/14 00:42, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
I'm sorry to say, but bitbucket repository is absolutely outdated and
I've now closed it completely. The current repository is now on github:
https://github.com/vstakhov/rspamd
The debian
Hi Mikhail,
On 08.08.2014 23:38, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
Thank you for your help. rspamd has moved to github (bitbucket repo is
stale. Vsevolod: hint-hint). Please have a look at up-to-date
debian/copyright here:
https://github.com/vstakhov/rspamd/blob/master/debian/copyright. I'll
go through it
Hi Johannes,
On 08.08.2014 20:08, Johannes Schauer wrote:
Quoting Andreas Cadhalpun (2014-08-08 01:42:33)
In order to help the ftp-masters processing the NEW queue[1], I have
reviewed the debian/copyright file of ocp-indent following the
guidelines at [2].
For this task I obtained the sources
waiting, it would be nice to know the decision criteria for
such important management issues.
I think he was talking about SPL [1], not zfs-linux here.
As far as I know nothing has been resolved with respect to zfs-linux, yet.
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Andreas Cadhalpun
wrote:
This
Hi,
On 09.08.2014 02:33, Darik Horn wrote:
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
wrote:
OK, it's fine to have them separated, but in that case shouldn't the
copyright of the default stanza match what the COPYRIGHT file says, or maybe
just add Sun Microsystems, Inc. to t
Hi Johannes,
On 09.08.2014 08:33, Johannes Schauer wrote:
I noticed something else: when you added tests/passing/traverse.mli as being
licensed under AGPL-3, is it not necessary to paste the full text of the AGPL-3
because the AGPL cannot be found in /usr/share/common-licenses? I added the
text
Hi Charles,
On 09.08.2014 11:45, Charles Plessy wrote:
I searched for license information missing from your debian/copyright and could
find only one case, libavutil/x86/x86inc.asm, which is under the ISC license.
The debian/copyright file of your package looks comprehensive to me.
Many thanks
Hi Jonas,
On 09.08.2014 13:51, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Andreas Cadhalpun (2014-08-09 13:34:04)
On 09.08.2014 11:45, Charles Plessy wrote:
I searched for license information missing from your debian/copyright
and could find only one case, libavutil/x86/x86inc.asm, which is
under the
Hi Vsevolod,
On 11.08.2014 16:18, Vsevolod Stakhov wrote:
I've applied the suggested patch to both 0.6 and master branches. Thank
you for the contribution!
You're welcome. I hope this helps to get rspamd into Debian.
It's probably a good idea to upload a new package with debian/copyright
fix
Hi Rogério,
On 05.04.2015 06:30, Rogério Brito wrote:
> It would be super nice to have ffmpeg compiled with libvidstab in Debian.
Yes, that would be nice to have indeed. ;)
> Please, see bug #709193 [0] for a RFP bug. I may consider co-maintaining it,
> if you want (I'm just so full of packages
Hi Thomas,
On 27.09.2015 18:52, Thomas Koch wrote:
> I request assistance with maintaining the unpaper package in Debian.
>
> When the unpaper 6.1 is built in Debian unstable against ffmpeg it fails
> to load the png files from its own tests folder. I already filled an
> upstream bug about this:
ch as 1.09998.
I think it would be better to use a separate soversion, starting
with 0 and only incrementing it, when the API/ABI is broken.
Best regards,
Andreas
1: https://github.com/rbrito/pkg-libvidstab
>From 8019116661556a800166ee84947f8808feef3086 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andreas C
Hi,
On 16.07.2015 14:12, Miguel A. Colón Vélez wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 6:34 AM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
>> has anyone seen this yet?
>>
>> https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/mplayer_2:1.1.1+r37401-1.html
>>
>> Does anyone know what is going on, has anyone been informed, has anyone
>> been
Hi,
I have rebuilt the 111 reverse build-dependencies of src:libav currently
in sid against FFmpeg, by replacing the Libav '-dev' dependencies with
the appropriate FFmpeg '-ffmpeg-dev' dependencies.
67 of these packages build right away, 13 have a fixed version in
experimental and 19 can be fi
Hi Niv,
On 26.04.2014 21:02, Niv Sardi wrote:
I'm happy to sponsor the upload, but am a bit confused about what
Package to look at.
Thanks for the offer to sponsor this.
The packaging is in the following repository:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/ffmpeg.git;a=summary
You can
Hi Niv,
thanks for reviewing.
On 27.04.2014 21:24, Niv Sardi wrote:
I took a little bit of time to review your packages today,
you overhall did a really good job, and your efforts to bring FFMPEG
into debian are very apreciated
that said, here are a couple of things I think we need to fix befo
Hi,
On 28.04.2014 03:17, Cyborg Ethly Alpha {My Research Desk} wrote:
I've been watching the discussion. I'll be test benching the differences
with FFmpeg and Libav (on the same system) through-out the year.
That's interesting. How do you intend to benchmark this?
Do you want to test the comma
Hi Niv,
I'm wondering, whether I should rename the libraries to *-ffmpegNNN.
Do you still think I should?
Have you found any other things that could be improved in the FFmpeg
packaging?
Best regards,
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Hi Niv,
On 04.05.2014 13:03, Niv Sardi wrote:
I haven't gotten the time to look more into this, and am now in a 25hrs
bus with limited internet access.
I see.
My rationale is this:
- I don't want to ofend the libav maintainers nor want them to go on a
+300 api bump.
I don't want to offend
Hi,
On 04.05.2014 22:16, Cyborg Ethly Alpha {My Research Desk} wrote:
On one system, I have FFmpeg 2.x is installed side by side with Libav ;
The package listing from Synaptic shows;
libavcodec-extra-52
This is from version 0.5...
libavcodec-extra-53
...and this from version 0.8.
libavco
Hi,
On 10.06.2014 02:06, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
I took a first look at the package, and it builds a shared library by
default (good). Unfortunately, it doesn't provide a proper SONAME:
$ objdump -p libx265.so | grep SONAME
SONAME libx265.so
It does have a proper SONAME, when
Hi David,
On 03.07.2014 15:46, David L. Craig wrote:
Having discovered this bug report and subsequently absorbing
it, I cloned the repository, built the debs, and installed
them into my primary Sid box. Now I need to track the repo.
Thanks for testing the repository!
I hope the packages work
Hi all,
some of you may have noticed a weird ffmpeg package in the NEW queue[1].
Let me explain:
In 2011 Libav[2] was forked from FFmpeg[3]. It was a time of great
uncertainty, the fork happened with much drama that didn't help making a
technical cut, and at that peculiar time Debian switched to
Hi Reinhard,
On 28.07.2014 02:05, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
wrote:
* Does it make sense for me to switch my package?
The rule of thumb is, if your upstream uses FFmpeg for development
you probably want to switch to using it, too
Hi Julien,
On 28.07.2014 10:44, Julien Cristau wrote:
It remains to be seen, what the release team prefers: frustrated users and
developers or both forks in jessie.
The release team is likely to let the people involved in multimedia foo
fight it out among themselves and pick a winner.
I am n
On 28.07.2014 13:24, Alessio Treglia wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:12 PM, "IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)"
wrote:
Except that, for a lot of the depending packages, there would be an
immediate benefit in the number of bugs fixed.
at least in theory.
Plus I would definitely appreciate
On 28.07.2014 13:52, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
In [1], Moritz from the security team clearly stated that he is more
than uncomfortable with having more than one copy of libavcodec in
debian/testin
Hi Bálint,
On 07.02.2016 18:16, Balint Reczey wrote:
> * Package name: dcadec
> Version : 0.2.0
> * URL : https://github.com/foo86/dcadec
> * License : LGPL-2.1
> Programming Lang: C
> Description : DTS Coherent Acoustics decoder - shared library
>
> A fr
Control: retitle -1 ITA: virglrenderer -- virtual GPU for KVM virtualization
On 15.01.2017 16:10, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> For virgl support in qemu
>
> slides:
>
> http://www.linux-kvm.org/images/f/f3/01x08b-KVMGT-a.pdf
>
> http://www.linux-kvm.org/images/3/36/Kvm-forum-2013-virgilpres.pdf
>
>
Hi Bryan,
On 17.01.2014 10:13, Bryan Fisher wrote:
I was hoping that maybe you could assist me in the issue that I am
getting with server h/w please.
Attached is a screenshot of what happens when I insert a USB key to copy
the Breakin log file. It also indicates that ‘Failid – Other tests have
On 12.02.2014 18:35, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
is there any reason why you closed Bug #718267 with your message to
announce the default init system for jessie?
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=718267#20
I didn't, actually.[1]
Hi all,
I have looked at the packaging provided by Antoine and it seems - no
offense intended - a little bit messy.
Thus I have started from scratch and packaged FFmpeg 2.1.3 [1] (see
attached debian.tar.xz).
I have taken care to avoid conflicts with libav as far as possible, but
the develop
Hi Antoine,
On 22.02.2014 18:56, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
On 2014-02-22 12:39:20, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>> Thus I have started from scratch and packaged FFmpeg 2.1.3 [1] (see
>> attached debian.tar.xz).
>
> Awesome!
;)
I have taken care to avoid conflicts with libav as fa
[Adding the CCs again, I hope you don't mind.]
Hi Timothy,
thanks for your remarks and sorry for not responding sooner, I got
distracted...
On 22.02.2014 20:39, Timothy Gu wrote:
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Andreas Cadhalpun
wrote:
Upstream thinks qt-faststart is not used very
Hi Moritz,
On 23.02.2014 22:56, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
I don't have the time nor the interest to discuss this at length, so
EOD from my side.
since you started this discussion by effectively preventing FFmpeg from
being uploaded, I take it that you ending this discussion now means
FFmpeg c
Control: owner -1 !
Control: retitle -1 ITP: ffmpeg -- complete, cross-platform solution to
record, convert and stream audio and video
Hi all,
I intend to package and maintain FFmpeg for Debian. Co-maintainers are
welcome.
The security team is invited to discuss why FFmpeg is security-wise
Hi Moritz,
On 25.02.2014 17:57, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 11:36:36PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
Hi Moritz,
On 23.02.2014 22:56, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
I don't have the time nor the interest to discuss this at length, so
EOD from my side.
since you started
On 25.02.2014 17:52, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
On 2014-02-25 11:43:25, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
Antoine, are you willing to sponsor this, maybe becoming a co-maintainer?
I am willing to sponsor an upload, but I don't have much time,
especially not to become a co-maintainer.
Thank
On 25.02.2014 22:18, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 06:23:20PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
No, it means I don't have the time, nor nerve to discuss this. We're
after all busy to keep Debian secure and sick of maintainers who only
focus on their pet package and n
Hi Clint,
On 26.02.2014 02:39, Clint Adams wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:30:25PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
Ideally the security team should now evaluate which of the two are
better from a security point of view and based on this decide, which
one they would prefer to see in jessie
Hi Michael,
On 26.02.2014 02:44, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Id like to volunteer to help with any future security issues in
FFmpeg packages in debian.
The best place to start is testing and (more preferably) patches for
the present libav
Hi Antoine,
On 26.02.2014 14:15, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
On 2014-02-26 04:56:02, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
At the moment I think Antoine is still reviewing my packaging before
sponsoring an upload.
This was a misunderstanding - I thought more work would be done on the
package first. :)
I
by
approximately factor 4), or move the libraries to /usr/lib/ffmpeg in a
first phase.
On 26.02.2014 21:34, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 05:43:25PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
I intend to package and maintain FFmpeg for Debian. Co-maintainers
are welcome.
I am interes
Hi Jonathan,
unfortunately you haven't forwarded my and Alexander's request to join
collab-maint to n...@debian.org. Thus we still don't have access to the
repository you created.
Are you still interested in packaging FFmpeg for Debian?
Best regards,
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
Hi Daniel
On 21.03.2014 22:06, Cyborg Ethly Alpha {My Research Desk} wrote:
I'm interested in becoming a co-maintainer.
You are welcome to do so.
There is already a collab-maint git repository on alioth [1], but
unfortunately some permissions are wrong, so I can't push my packaging
to it. I
Hi,
On 22.03.2014 21:16, Cyborg Ethly Alpha {My Research Desk} wrote:
Thank you very much. I was thinking, that it might be a good idea to
have a second (back) repository, just in case. It would relieve pressure
on the primary repository and provide better up-time. While I currently
don't have a
Hi Jonathan,
I updated my packaging to FFmpeg 2.2 and was finally able to push it to
the collab-maint repository [1].
Please review and test this. When we are satisfied with it, you could
upload it to experimental.
Best regards,
Andreas
1: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/
Hi Norbert,
On 27.03.2014 14:49, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Thu, 27 Mar 2014, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
I updated my packaging to FFmpeg 2.2 and was finally able to push it
to the collab-maint repository [1].
I tried to build in a clean cowbuilder on amd64, but it dies right
at the beginning
Hi Norbert,
On 27.03.2014 14:49, Norbert Preining wrote:
I tried to build in a clean cowbuilder on amd64, but it dies right
at the beginning after configure:
...
Creating config.mak, config.h, and doc/config.texi...
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/ffmpeg-2.2'
debian/rules override_dh
On 21.04.2014 12:42, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Debian Bug Tracking System dixit:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed against the src:mplayer package:
#728772: mplayer: FTBFS: The architecture of your CPU (UNKNOWN) is not supported
It has been closed by Deb
Hi,
On 23.04.2014 23:08, Cyborg Ethly Alpha {My Research Desk} wrote:
I'm in the middle of clearing up some network issues (on my network).
It seems you're not the only one with network issues, as Thorsten Glaser
seems to be temporarily unavailable:
Delivery to the following recipient has be
57 matches
Mail list logo
