Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Sure, one can install
all the firmware-*
packages in Debian, and thus be sure one has all the firmware one needs.
However that is a big waste. Many megabytes of wasted updates for who
knows what, some IBM printer from 1967, who knows?
Therefore there should be a
OK, working with
$ apt-cache policy emacs
emacs:
Installed: 1:27.1+1-3
Candidate: 1:27.1+1-3
Version table:
*** 1:27.1+1-3 990
990 http://opensource.nchc.org.tw/debian unstable/main amd64 Packages
tramp-version is a variable defined in ‘tramp-cmds.el’.
Its value is "2.4.3.27.1"
I.e.
All I know is many bugs are fixed in the newer versions.
Fine.
After reviewing https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=968194
one feels yes, an independent getmail6 package would be the best solution
for now rather than upgrading a single getmail package.
> "SM" == Sudip Mukherjee writes:
SM> X-Debbugs-Cc: Osamu Aoki
I'm not sure that line will work there. I'll CC him anyway.
SM> This getmail6 will install files like:
SM> /usr/bin/getmail
SM> /usr/bin/getmail_fetch
SM> /usr/bin/getmail_mbox
SM> /usr/bin/getmail_maildir
SM> /usr/bin/getmail-g
Indeed in
https://github.com/getmail6/getmail6/issues/33#issuecomment-681888347 we
see the trend across distributions is for a single getmail package
upgraded to 6 and not two packages.
Actually I am guessing the current maintainer isn't reading these
emails, and you Sudip, should consider non-maintainer uploads or steps
on how to take over the project altogether from non-active maintainers.
> "OA" == Osamu Aoki writes:
OA> Hi,
OA> I am about to request for package removal of current getmail package.
OA> So whoever decide to package this new python3 getmail, please go ahead
OA> without worrying file conflict.
Maybe don't remove it, but just hand it over to Sudip for upgrade.
I can test a Prerelease getmail6 .deb for you when you make one.
To run the program, after downloading, do
$ java -jar GpsMaster_*.jar
(But this did not seem to work. So maybe do something else)
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
javax/xml/bind/JAXBException
Package: wnpp
These sections need to show up in some table of contents,
$ w3m -dump https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/work_needing | grep -P ^\\w ...
Packages up for adoption, by maintainer
Orphaned packages
Else they are buried deep within the document.
("Packages up for adoption" is at top, so
Package: wnpp
https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
apparently only shows package where a maintainer has cried for help,
or packages that don't exist yet, and people wish existed.
It should also list and mention how to file reports about
* Packages that reporters worry that the maintainer might be i
12 matches
Mail list logo
