Your message dated Thu, 18 Jan 2024 09:19:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1060891: fixed in pacparser 1.4.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1060891,
regarding O: pacparser -- library to parse proxy auto-config files (development
files)
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #977716 [wnpp] ITP: llhttp -- parser for HTTP messages
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #977716 to the same tags previously set
--
977716: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=977716
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs
Hi,
rsass can appropriately compile sass files which is convenient for Debian
packaging.
Thanks,
Alex
control: retitle -1 ITP: ocaml-posix -- OCaml bindings to the various POSIX APIs
Upstream has replaced this library with the ocaml-posix library
URL: https://github.com/savonet/ocaml-posix
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Kyle Robbertze
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Debian Developer
⠈⠳⣄ https://wiki.debian.org/KyleRobbertze
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 ITP: ocaml-posix -- OCaml bindings to the various POSIX APIs
Bug #956479 [wnpp] ITP: ocaml-sys-socket -- OCaml ctypes bindings to
system-specific low-level socket structure and data-types
Changed Bug title to 'ITP: ocaml-posix -- OCaml bindings to the var
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 1057618 with 1061074
Bug #1057618 [libpod] Fwd: [containers/podman] Release v4.8.1 - v4.8.1
1057618 was blocked by: 1057406 1057435
1057618 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1057618: 1061074
> thanks
Stopping processing her
Hello,
I'm wondering whether you need some help with the packaging of Hare. Is your
current state available somewhere?
Thanks,
Mt
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Your message dated Thu, 18 Jan 2024 17:08:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1060855: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #762542,
regarding O: nxcl -- NX X compression client library
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Your message dated Thu, 18 Jan 2024 18:00:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1059231: fixed in qt6-location 6.6.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1059231,
regarding ITP: qt6-location -- Qt6 Location
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Your message dated Thu, 18 Jan 2024 18:00:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1060319: fixed in sdl2-compat
2.28.50~git20240110~c5faaac+ds-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1060319,
regarding ITP: sdl2-compat -- SDL 2 binary compatibility library wrapping SDL 3
to be marked as done.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-go-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
* Package name: prometheus-script-exporter
Version : 2.17.0
Upstream Contact: https://github.com/ricoberger
* URL : https://github.com/ricoberger/script_exporter
* License
Hi Reinhard,
Instead of packaging golang-github-cyberphone-json-canonicalization I
uploaded a NMU for golang-webpki-org-jsoncanonicalizer to make it
provide the name that rekor expects, thereby closing this ITP bug with
this NMU upload. See debdiff below.
What do you think about moving this pack
Your message dated Thu, 18 Jan 2024 19:34:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1060820: fixed in golang-webpki-org-jsoncanonicalizer
0.20210204-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1060820,
regarding ITP: golang-github-cyberphone-json-canonicalization -- JSON
Canonicalization Scheme (J
Your message dated Thu, 18 Jan 2024 23:14:59 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1005814: ITP: debfetch -- Prints short info about
Debian.
has caused the Debian Bug report #1005814,
regarding ITP: debfetch -- Prints short info about Debian.
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
Your message dated Thu, 18 Jan 2024 22:19:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1060819: fixed in golang-github-zeebo-errs 1.3.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1060819,
regarding ITP: golang-github-zeebo-errs -- errs is a package for making errors
friendly and easy
to be marked as do
Hi Wim,
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 14:58:55 + Wim Bertels wrote:
> there is a comparison available on:
> https://forgejo.org/compare/
I'm aware that Gitea and Forgejo have their own pros and cons. I meant they both
share a lot of the same dependencies, and those dependencies aren't available in
Deb
16 matches
Mail list logo