Bug#974038: marked as done (ITA: cronie -- Process Scheduling Daemon)

2022-05-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 04 May 2022 15:49:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#974038: fixed in cronie 1.6.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #974038, regarding ITA: cronie -- Process Scheduling Daemon to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with

Bug#1010436: marked as done (ITP: ruby-sentry-rails -- provides Rails integration for the Sentry error logger)

2022-05-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 04 May 2022 19:00:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1010436: fixed in ruby-sentry-rails 5.3.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1010436, regarding ITP: ruby-sentry-rails -- provides Rails integration for the Sentry error logger to be marked as done. This mea

Bug#1009902: marked as done (ITP: pyqt6-webengine -- Python bindings for the Qt WebEngine framework)

2022-05-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 04 May 2022 19:00:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1009902: fixed in pyqt6-webengine 6.3.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1009902, regarding ITP: pyqt6-webengine -- Python bindings for the Qt WebEngine framework to be marked as done. This means that you c

Bug#1010481: marked as done (ITP: ruby-view-component -- View components for Rails)

2022-05-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 04 May 2022 19:00:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1010481: fixed in ruby-view-component 2.53.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1010481, regarding ITP: ruby-view-component -- View components for Rails to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Bug#1009244: marked as done (ITP: pyqt6 -- Python bindings for Qt 6)

2022-05-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 04 May 2022 19:00:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1009244: fixed in pyqt6 6.2.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1009244, regarding ITP: pyqt6 -- Python bindings for Qt 6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#930966: ITP: pwnat -- allows clients behind NATs to communicate

2022-05-04 Thread Samuel Henrique
I have reviewed the packaging of Nilson Silva but it got blocked as I'm not sure this package is a good fit for our official repos. I could find issues on upstream's Github where people are talking about how the method pwnat uses is outdated (upstream even wrote a replacement, called slipstream)[

Bug#952810: Intent to adopt ebib

2022-05-04 Thread Aymeric Agon-Rambosson
Hello Mr. Whitton, First of all, thank you for your work as maintainer of ebib. I use ebib regularly, and I am ready to adopt it. In fact, I already have a completely debian-compliant and lintian-clean package of the last upstream version in my private debian archive, that I have been using

Bug#1007867: O: parsebib

2022-05-04 Thread Aymeric Agon-Rambosson
Hello Mr. Whitton, First of all, thank you for your work as maintainer of parsebib. I use parsebib regularly, and I am ready to adopt it. In fact, I already have a completely debian-compliant and lintian-clean package of the last upstream version in my private debian archive, that I have be

Bug#976308: ITA: cfengine3 -- tool for configuring and maintaining network machines

2022-05-04 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, Release Team member here going over RC bugs for bookworm. On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 16:45:18 +0300 Fabio Tranchitella wrote: I will upload the updated package for cfengine3 in the next few days. What's the status? cfengin3 has an RC bug #852674, but is not eligible for autoremoval due to its