Hi Tony,
Thank you very much for your offer but strawberry is already sponsored and
waiting in the NEW queue now. So hopefully it will be accepted very soon.
I should have mention the ongoing review/sponsoring here, I'm sorry about that.
Cheers,
Thomas
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 wnpp
Bug #979685 [windonesian] /usr/share/dict/indonesian
Warning: Unknown package 'windonesian'
Bug reassigned from package 'windonesian' to 'wnpp'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #979685 to the same values
previously set
Ignoring reque
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 ITP: gitlab-labkit
Bug #979473 [wnpp] ITP: golang-gitlab-gitlab-org-labkit -- A minimalist library
to provide functionality for Go services at GitLab
Changed Bug title to 'ITP: gitlab-labkit' from 'ITP:
golang-gitlab-gitlab-org-labkit -- A minimalist lib
control: retitle -1 ITP: gitlab-labkit
Hi! all,
I'm renaming 'golang-gitlab-gitlab-org-labkit' package to
'gitlab-labkit', to make things consistent with other Go based Gitlab's
packages [1].
[1]: https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages?utf8=%E2%9C%93&filter=gitlab
Cheers,
Vipul
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: cri-o
Version : 1.20
Upstream Author : Multiple Authors
* URL : https://cri-o.io/
* License : Apache 2.0
Programming Lang: Golang
Description : Lightweight container runtime for Kubernetes
cri-o provides
On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 10:34:25AM +0200, Thomas Pierson wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> Thank you very much for your offer but strawberry is already sponsored and
> waiting in the NEW queue now. So hopefully it will be accepted very soon.
>
> I should have mention the ongoing review/sponsoring here, I'm
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 wnpp
Bug #979718 [rduty] request for new package rduty
Warning: Unknown package 'rduty'
Bug reassigned from package 'rduty' to 'wnpp'.
No longer marked as found in versions 0.3.2-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #979718 to the same value
On Fri, 08 Jan 2021 at 16:30:08 +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Gentle ping reg.
> https://salsa.debian.org/utopia-team/dbus/-/merge_requests/8 as
> deadlines are fast approaching - dbus-broker has cleared NEW, so I'd
> like to sort out the details regarding repository and team
> maintainership and m
On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 at 19:43, Simon McVittie wrote:
>
> On Fri, 08 Jan 2021 at 16:30:08 +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > Gentle ping reg.
> > https://salsa.debian.org/utopia-team/dbus/-/merge_requests/8 as
> > deadlines are fast approaching - dbus-broker has cleared NEW, so I'd
> > like to sort out
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jan 2021 22:00:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#806464: fixed in trufont 0.6.6+ds-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #806464,
regarding ITP: trufont -- cross-platform ufo3 font editor
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jan 2021 22:00:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#977885: fixed in libdata-uriencode-perl 0.11-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #977885,
regarding ITP: libdata-uriencode-perl -- encodes and decodes complex data
structures for use in URI's
to be marked as do
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jan 2021 22:00:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#978083: fixed in docknot 4.00-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #978083,
regarding ITP: docknot -- Generate package documentation from metadata
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jan 2021 22:00:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#977936: fixed in python-multipart 0.0.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #977936,
regarding ITP: python-multipart -- streaming multipart parser for Python
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Happy New Year Christoph.
Do i have to be worried about that the architectur of the package ist "armel"?
Reiner Schulz
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Debian Bug Tracking System [mailto:ow...@bugs.debian.org]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 10. Januar 2021 00:03
An: Schulz, Reiner
Betreff: Bug#9775
Schulz, Reiner wrote...
> Happy New Year Christoph.
>
> Do i have to be worried about that the architectur of the package ist
> "armel"?
No, armel was just used for the initial upload, the Debian build daemons
will take care of the rest, current status is at[1]. So unless you intend to
use thi
15 matches
Mail list logo