Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Porte
* Package name: fonts-jetbrains-mono
Version : 1.0.3
* URL : https://www.jetbrains.com/lp/mono/
* License : Apache-2.0
Description : free and open-source typeface for developers
JetBrains Mono. A typefac
On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 11:00:25AM +0100, Romain Porte wrote:
> * Package name: fonts-jetbrains-mono
> Version : 1.0.3
> * URL : https://www.jetbrains.com/lp/mono/
> JetBrains Mono. A typeface for developers.
> Features include:
> - Increased height for a better reading
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Pirate Praveen
https://rubygems.org/gems/binding_ninja for gitlab autopkgtest
(dependency of rspec-parameterized)
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hideki Yamane
* Package name: docker-clean
Version : 2.0.4
Upstream Author : ZZROT Design
* URL : https://github.com/ZZROTDesign/docker-clean/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Shell script
Description : simple
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hideki Yamane
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, henr...@debian.org
* Package name: docker-clean
Version : 2.0.4
Upstream Author : ZZROT Design
* URL : https://github.com/ZZROTDesign/docker-clean/
* License : M
Your message dated Mon, 2 Mar 2020 19:43:10 +0900
with message-id <20200302194310.cf359843fd585c3f4bba2...@iijmio-mail.jp>
and subject line Re: Bug#952957: ITP: docker-clean -- simple Shell script to
clean up the Docker Daemon
has caused the Debian Bug report #952957,
regarding ITP: docker-clean -
Hi,
since [1] seems to have valid packaging content and I've had a few users
reporting to use that for a while and it works well. Therefore I wanted to
ask what this might be missing - just someone who does the dput or was
there more going on in the background that is missing here?
P.S. I did a si
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sascha Steinbiss
* Package name: dnsdbq
Version : 1.99
Upstream Author : Farsight Security, Inc.
* URL : https://github.com/dnsdb/dnsdbq
* License : Apache 2.0 and ISC
Programming Lang: C
Description : API client
On Dec 30, Marco d'Itri via RPKI wrote:
> > Building a real package will still require a few more crates to be
> Right now I am stuck on rpki depending on a very old version of ring.
> The verification API has changed since then and I do not know enough
> Rust to update rpki.
routinator packagi
Marco d'Itri via RPKI wrote:
> On Dec 30, Marco d'Itri via RPKI wrote:
>
> > > Building a real package will still require a few more crates to
> > > be
> > Right now I am stuck on rpki depending on a very old version of
> > ring. The verification API has changed since then and I do not know
>
Hi,
Le 02/03/2020 à 11:31, Adam Borowski a écrit :
>> This is my very first debian package, I am looking for a sponsor to get
>> through this first interaction with the Debian project. In the medium
>> term, I am interrested in becoming a Debian packager so that there is no
>> need to go on the sp
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 950152 ITP: fonts-jetbrains-mono -- free and open-source typeface for
> developers
Bug #950152 [wnpp] RFP: fonts-jetbrains-mono -- a typeface for developers
Changed Bug title to 'ITP: fonts-jetbrains-mono -- free and open-source
typeface
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> merge 950152 952954
Bug #950152 [wnpp] ITP: fonts-jetbrains-mono -- free and open-source typeface
for developers
Bug #952954 [wnpp] ITP: fonts-jetbrains-mono -- free and open-source typeface
for developers
Merged 950152 952954
>
End of message,
On 2020-02-18 22:30:59, Samuel Henrique wrote:
> Control: owner -1 !
>
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 at 13:41, Jason Pleau wrote:
>>
>> I pushed what I had here: https://gitlab.com/jpleau/polybar/
>>
>> It's not targetting debian (simply because I'm using ubuntu these
>> days). Feel free to take whatever
Hello again,
Le 02/03/2020 à 14:54, Romain Porte a écrit :
> I propose to start the review using the following files that I host on
> a personal server:
> https://microjoe.org/fonts-jetbrains-mono_1.0.3.tar.xz
> https://microjoe.org/fonts-jetbrains-mono_1.0.3.orig.tar.gz
Some updates:
1) I have
Hi,
are you still planning on packaging loompy?
I had packaged a version personally but hadn't gotten around to
submitting the ITP.
Diane
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Your message dated Tue, 03 Mar 2020 07:00:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#950617: fixed in python-pyfakefs 3.7.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #950617,
regarding ITP: python-pyfakefs -- implements a fake file system that mocks the
Python file system modules
to be marked as done
17 matches
Mail list logo
