Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: elpa-rainbow-blocks
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : "Steṕhane (istib)"
* URL : https://github.com/istib/rainbow-blocks
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: emacs-lisp
Description : highlight paren/bracket/b
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 ITP: parsero -- Audit tool for robots.txt of a site
Bug #949198 [wnpp] ITP: parsero -- Audit tool for robots.txt of a site
Ignoring request to change the title of bug#949198 to the same title
--
949198: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=9
Control: retitle -1 ITP: parsero -- Audit tool for robots.txt of a site
On Vi, 17 ian 20, 21:37:48, Thiago Andrade Marques wrote:
> Subject: ITP: parsero -- Audit tool for robots.txt of a site
> Package: wnpp
> Owner: Thiago Andrade Marques
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: parsero
>
Package: wnpp
Owner: gregor herrmann
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libyaml-pp-perl
Version : 0.018
Upstream Author : Tina M??ller
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/YAML-PP
* License
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit package wnpp
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'wnpp'
Limit currently set to 'package':'wnpp'
> tags 949250 + pending
Bug #949250 [wnpp] ITP: libyaml-pp-perl -- pure-perl YAML framework
Added tag(s) pending.
>
On 2020-01-18 04:38 +, Mo Zhou wrote:
>
> There are many deep learning frameworks, where each of them has been
> backed by a certain business group, e.g.
>
> (1) TensorFlow -- Google
> (2) PyTorch -- Facebook
> (3) MXNet -- Amazon
> (4) NLTK -- Micro$oft
>
> There are a bunch of dee
Your message dated Sat, 18 Jan 2020 23:10:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948223: fixed in sugar 2.0.1-1~exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #948223,
regarding ITP: libsugar-java -- T
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Hello Jason,
> Feel free to take over the ITP and the packaging. I had deleted the
> repo because I wanted to start over when I decided not to split the
> libraries and I forgot to re-create and push what I had so far. I'll
> try to have it on salsa over the weekend.
Great, I managed to get a wor
Your message dated Sun, 19 Jan 2020 01:00:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#920956: fixed in fonts-recommended 0
has caused the Debian Bug report #920956,
regarding ITP: fonts-recommended -- set of recommended fonts
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
9 matches
Mail list logo