Your message dated Mon, 11 Nov 2019 22:00:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#929094: fixed in guile-git 0.2.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #929094,
regarding ITP: guile-git -- guile bindings for git
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I intend to orphan the ldm package.
Newer versions of LTSP no longer make use of LDM; it is no longer
maintained upstream.
Marking it as orphaned for now just in case someone wants to maintain
the legacy LTSP 5.x and they could adopt this component.
If nobody want
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I intend to orphan the ldm-themes package.
Newer versions of LTSP no longer make use of LDM; it is no longer
maintained upstream.
Marking it as orphaned for now just in case someone wants to maintain
the legacy LTSP 5.x and they could adopt this component.
If nobo
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I intend to orphan the ltspfs package.
Newer versions of LTSP no longer make use of LTSPFS; it is no longer
maintained upstream.
Marking it as orphaned for now just in case someone wants to maintain
the legacy LTSP 5.x and they could adopt this component.
If nobod
On 2019-11-12 07:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
Hi Drew,
please also mention
qutip-4.4.1/qutip/qip/circuit_latex.py
in your debian/copyright.
Confused. qutip/qip/circuit_latex.py is already mentioned:
Files: *
Copyright: 2011 and later Paul D. Nation and Robert J. Johansson
License: BSD3
i
On Mon, 2019-11-11 at 21:37 +, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 10:01 PM Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sun, 2019-11-10 at 21:29 +, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 07:56:55PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2019-11-04 at 21:44 +000
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 930440 + pending
Bug #930440 [wnpp] ITP: podman -- Library and tool for running OCI-based
containers in Pods
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
930440: https://bugs.debian.
On 2019/11/12 00:29, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> Newer versions of LTSP no longer make use of LDM; it is no longer
> maintained upstream.
In my opinion, ltspfs, ldm-themes and ldm won't be of particular use of
anyone. Any objections if I file for them to be removed from the archive
instead?
-Jonat
101 - 108 of 108 matches
Mail list logo