Hi!
On 02/28/2014 06:23 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> I am not an ftp-master but if I were one (and as a mentor for quite a
> few projects) I would have preferred to have re-uploads because
>
> - ftp masters already looked at some past version
We are talking about packages in NEW, those haven'
Now I'm packaging this.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/CAJCFWRXXXZ769pe8jB-ywyj6rdZzy219xXpurZobKvAYS=x...@mail.gmail.com
Hi,
This is a second reminder. It is now 1st March 2014, i.e. approximately 5
1/2 months since I followed up to the ftpmaster email on 11th September
2013. I spent a great deal of time working on this packaging
(approximately 1 month), and I would appreciate it if the ftpmasters would
show m
On 28/02/2014 15:13, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> On Feb 28, 2014, at 1:29 PM, Robert Millan wrote:
>
>> The proposed package is poorly integrated with existing ZFS packages (e.g.
>> zfsutils for native
>> kFreeBSD support).
>>
>> First and foremost, there's a namespace grab which is likely to resu
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniel Pocock
Upstream:
https://github.com/ganglia/gmetric4j
License:
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to
deal
in the Software without r
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniel Pocock
Upstream:
https://github.com/ganglia/jmxetric
License:
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to
deal
in the Software without re
On Mar 1, 2014, at 2:25 PM, Robert Millan wrote:
> I already explained. Nobody listens... (sigh)
All I've seen is that you "think" that it "might" be a problem and that we
"might" be better of renaming it...
Please give us/me a direct link to the Debian GNU/Linux policy point that
explain tha
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 673225 by 740442
Bug #673225 [wnpp] ITA: par2cmdline -- Parity Archive Volume Set, for checking
and repair of files
673225 was not blocked by any bugs.
673225 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 673225: 740442
> stop
Stoppin
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jean Schurger
* Package name: libwfd
Version : 0.0.0
Upstream Author : David Herrmann
* URL : http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/miraclecast
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C
Description : Library for Wif
Your message dated Sat, 01 Mar 2014 18:03:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#692492: fixed in audit 1:2.3.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #692492,
regarding ITA: audit -- tools, library, plugin and bindings for security
auditing
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 731975 ITP: pybitmessage -- peer-to-peer trustless communication
Bug #731975 [wnpp] RFP: bitmessage -- peer-to-peer trustless communication
protocol
Changed Bug title to 'ITP: pybitmessage -- peer-to-peer trustless
communication' from 'R
Changing status to ITP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53123ed5.4020...@bitmessage.ch
Right now 1000s of people build ffmpeg daily from git,
just to have a working copy.
Please drop libav + add back ffmpeg.
Thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists
Package: wnpp
Owner: gregor herrmann
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libhttp-cookiejar-perl
Version : 0.006
Upstream Author : David Golden
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/HTTP-CookieJar
*
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #libhttp-cookiejar-perl (0.006-1) unstable; urgency=low
> #
> # * Initial Release. Closes: #740467
> #
> limit package wnpp
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'wnpp'
Limit currently set to 'package':'wnpp'
> tags 74
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2014-03-02
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : mariadb-galera-5.5
Version : 5.5.35
Upstream Author : MariaDB Foundation
* URL : http://mariadb.org/
* License : GPL
Description : A clustered version of MariaDB 5.5
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ.
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2014-03-02
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : mariadb-galera-10.0
Version : 10.0.7
Upstream Author : MariaDB Foundation
* URL : http://mariadb.org/
* License : GPL
Description : A clustered version of MariaDB 10.0
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-req
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2014-03-02
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : mariadb-10.0
Version : 10.0.8
Upstream Author : MariaDB Foundation
* URL : http://mariadb.org/
* License : GPL
Description : The latest generation of MariaDB
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 740423 with 706119
Bug #740423 [gitg] gitg: New upstream version 0.3.2 available
740423 was not blocked by any bugs.
740423 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 740423: 706119
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
On 1 March 2014 15:46, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> On Mar 1, 2014, at 2:25 PM, Robert Millan wrote:
>
>> I already explained. Nobody listens... (sigh)
>
> All I've seen is that you "think" that it "might" be a problem and that we
> "might" be better of renaming it...
>
>
> Please give us/me a dire
On Mar 2, 2014, at 4:52 AM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Hostile binary takeover is not allowed - that is two separate source
> packages should not build the same binary package names, even if on
> different architectures.
Ok, sounds reasonable when you say it like that. I'd still appreciate a li
On Mar 2, 2014, at 6:56 AM, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> On Mar 2, 2014, at 4:52 AM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>
>> Since these are two different implementations
>
> You said it yourself - they are different implementations.
Actually, this is not quite true either come to think of it.
> they bo
22 matches
Mail list logo
