Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Package name: optional-dev
Version: 20120908
Author: Dmitry Smirnov
License: GPL-3+
Description: fake (empty) dev package
Purpose of this package is to provide an
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> owner 687001 !
Bug #687001 [wnpp] ITP: optional-dev -- fake (empty) dev package
Owner recorded as Dmitry Smirnov .
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
687001: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c
Source package is available from
https://mentors.debian.net/package/optional-dev
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201209081724.24886.only...@member.f
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Saturday 8 September 08:03:11 UTC 2012
> # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
> # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
> #
> # Source package in NEW: haskell-network-multicast
> tags 686969 + pending
Bug #686969 [wnpp]
Hi,
"optional depends" - what?? Thats self contradictory. If a depends it's really
optional, it's not a depends, thus that package is buggy and should not be
fixed by introducing a nonsense package, but by removing this depends.
cheers,
Holger
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnp
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 685471 wnpp
Bug #685471 [remmina] ITA: remmina -- remote desktop client for GNOME desktop
environment
Bug reassigned from package 'remmina' to 'wnpp'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #685471 to the same values
previously
Hi,
On 08.09.2012 13:06, Simon McVittie wrote:
> It would perhaps make more sense if there was a way for the libchamplain
> maintainer to nominate excluded architectures, so empathy could say
> something like:
>
> Build-Depends: libchamplain-...-dev |
>champlain-unavailabl
On Sat, 8 Sep 2012 19:37:33 Holger Levsen wrote:
> "optional depends" - what?? Thats self contradictory. If a depends it's
> really optional, it's not a depends, thus that package is buggy and should
> not be fixed by introducing a nonsense package, but by removing this
> depends.
Not at all, it m
On Sat, 8 Sep 2012 22:01:17 +1000
Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Sep 2012 19:37:33 Holger Levsen wrote:
> > "optional depends" - what?? Thats self contradictory. If a depends it's
> > really optional, it's not a depends, thus that package is buggy and should
> > not be fixed by introducing a n
On 09/07/2012 10:25 PM, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
Xiangfu Liu writes:
Description : A small independent command line FPGA utilities, no GUI.
plain C, no C++, text-based file formats. convert floorplan from/to
bitstream.
Sounds interesting but the description is bit generic. What does
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 676894 ITA: remmina -- remote desktop client for GNOME desktop
> environment
Bug #676894 [wnpp] ITA: remmina -- remote desktop client for GNOME desktop
Bug #685471 [wnpp] ITA: remmina -- remote desktop client for GNOME desktop
environmen
On 07.09.2012 05:01, Rodolfo Granata wrote:
> Hey Markus,
>
> * Added wbar.png back
> * Updated make-conf.sh to take multiple search directories
> * I wanna keep the font even though it may not exist, if I'm not
> mistaken, wbar will start anyway and it will get a default if it does.
> * Added you
於 2012年09月08日 00:46, Bas Wijnen 提到:
> Hi,
>
> Just to let you know: repsnapper uses a library for some math, which I
> have packaged in Debian for the purpose of including repsnapper
> (vmmlib). However, the copy included in repsnapper's source is very old,
> and some changes are required to use t
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 7:10 PM, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Jason A. Donenfeld [2012.09.08.1852 +0200]:
>> Anyone up for discussing adding this package to debian?
>
> Have you considered doing it yourself?
I've already written the debian control files and done all the hard
work. As I do
Sorry it took me so long to respond. What exactly are the issues with
the build system that need to be addressed? I don't see why things like
noopt can't be done in debian/rules, but if some adjustments to the
Makefile are needed, so be it. A switch to autotools is pretty much out
of the questio
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Saturday 8 September 20:03:16 UTC 2012
> # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
> # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
> #
> # Source package in NEW: glyr
> tags 651416 + pending
Bug #651416 [wnpp] ITP: glyr -- search e
Hello Jendrik
I know there are already a lot of music player inside Debian but pogo is
the only one who satisfies by need for a folder/file based GUI music player.
Also this questions:
http://superuser.com/questions/326471/is-there-a-folder-only-based-music-player-for-linux
show some interest for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stefan Handschuh
* Package name: androidsdk-tools
Version : 14
Upstream Author : The Android Open Source Project
* URL : https://android.googlesource.com/platform/sdk
* License : Apache 2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Desc
On Sun, 9 Sep 2012 00:30:41 brian m. carlson wrote:
> Debian users depend on the package being built in a consistent way. For
> example, some packages are built with Kerberos support. While this is
> generally optional for most packages, I'd be very upset if, say, the
> Debian openssh-server pack
On Sun, 9 Sep 2012 02:06:52 Paul Wise wrote:
> I would be interested to see what real use-cases people wanted this
> sort of thing for. Dimitry, which specific problem were you trying to
> solve when you came up with optional-dev?
Thanks Paul, primarily I was trying to address a problem when packa
shlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Package name: optional-dev
Version: 20120908
Author: Dmitry Smirnov
License: GPL-3+
Description: fake (empty) dev package
Purpose of this package is to provide an alternative for
optional
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Stefan Handschuh wrote:
> * Package name: androidsdk-tools
You might want to create a team for packaging Android related things,
we already have an android-tools source package containing adb and
fastboot:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/a/android-tools.html
Ma
On Sep 9, 2012, at 3:34 AM, Stefan Handschuh
wrote:
> The sdk tools are containing *some* of the android build tools.
Stupid question:
Which parts are missing (and what do users miss without them) and why?
Cheers,
Adrian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
23 matches
Mail list logo
