Hi,
what's the status of this one? Would be nice to have this for my fingerprint
reader.
pgpCC9pMCxDIe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi!
Luca Capello wrote:
> Am I correct? Is tf-tool worth a single package or can I include it
> in libthinkfinger (as I'd prefer)?
I think it's common practice to put the tools in a separate package, and
suggest the name thinkfinger-tools instead of tf-tool, since it's easier for
the user to i
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: nspluginwrapper
Version : 0.9.91.2
Upstream Author : Gwenole Beauchesne
* URL : http://gwenole.beauchesne.info/en/projects/nspluginwrapper
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : Mozilla plugin t
Am Mittwoch, den 07.02.2007, 13:03 +0900 schrieb Charles Plessy:
> Package name: Orange-data-mining
[...]
Sounds very interesting.
> "Orange is released under General Public License (GPL) and as such is
> free if you use it under these terms. We do, however, oblige the users
> to cite the
Am Mittwoch, den 07.02.2007, 13:03 +0900 schrieb Charles Plessy:
> Package name: Orange-data-mining
> Version : 2007-02-06
> Upstream Author : Janez Demsar and Blaz Zupan (see also
> http://www.ailab.si/orange/acknowledgements.htm)
> URL : http://www.ailab.si/orang
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 02:09:54PM +0100, Robert Luberda wrote:
>
> Preliminary package (unfinished, not tested, lacks rebranding) can be
> found at http://pingu.ii.uj.edu.pl/~robert/iceape-locales/
>
Nice ... you think you can get the rebranding done soon, so we can
push this?
- Alexander
Your message dated Wed, 07 Feb 2007 15:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#409964: fixed in mozilla-firefox-adblock 0.5.3.043-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
On 7 Feb 2007 at 16:03, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > Preliminary package (unfinished, not tested, lacks rebranding) can be
> > found at http://pingu.ii.uj.edu.pl/~robert/iceape-locales/
>
> Nice ... you think you can get the rebranding done soon, so we can
> push this?
Yes. I've just uploaded the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 409367 ITP: iceape-l10n -- Iceape Language/Region Packages
Bug#409367: ITP: iceape-locales -- language packs for Iceape
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
retitle 409367 ITP: iceape-l10n -- Iceape Language/Region Packages
thanks
On 5 Feb 2007 at 19:46, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> "locale" usually is meant for "a locale", ie the definition of
> parameters that characterize a langage/country combination
>
> "l10n" is meant for "localisation" whic
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Pierre Chifflier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: prewikka
Version : 0.9.9
Upstream Author : Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.prelude-ids.org/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Des
retitle 407654 ITA: slidentd -- minimal ident (RFC 1413) daemon
Hi Daniel,
I'm a happy slidentd user and would be glad to take over
maintaining the package. I've built a new package that fixes
#376543 and includes some syntatic improvements to the man
pages so that they should render better. I up
Robert Luberda wrote:
> I can now see that the *-l10n-*
> name is much better than *-locale-*, that's why the package I've just
> uploaded is called iceape-l10n.
thanks for paying attention to it, makes the cat happy :)
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Em
David Smith wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
Hi,
> I'm a happy slidentd user and would be glad to take over
> maintaining the package.
Good, thanks a lot.
> I've built a new package that fixes
> #376543 and includes some syntatic improvements to the man
> pages so that they should render better. I uploaded
hi tyler,
i'm wondering if you are still planning on packaging libtap. this bug
report is >200 days old with no further comment from you.
i'm interested in using (packaging if necessary) this myself, and if
you're no longer interested and/or don't have the time, i'd like to
take over this ITP.
Sean,
Please take it over. Nobody ever replied to my RFS. :-(
- Tyler
sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi tyler,
>
> i'm wondering if you are still planning on packaging libtap. this bug
> report is >200 days old with no further comment from you.
>
> i'm intere
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 11:08 -0800, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> Sean,
> Please take it over. Nobody ever replied to my RFS. :-(
oh, i missed the RFS and only saw the ITP. if you're still interested
and have the source package laying around somewhere, i could sponsor it.
it doesn't look like thi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 408538 pending
Bug#408538: ITP: qwtplot3d -- A 3D plotting library based on Qt/OpenGL
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 409154 pending
Bug#409154: ITP: libapache2-mod-auth-o
On (07/02/07 23:39), Luca Capello wrote:
> >> [2] I still have a problem, because e.g. "PAM module for the SGS
> >> Thomson Microelectronics fingerprint reader" is longer than the
> >> expected 60 characters for the short description. Suggestions
> >> welcome!
> >
> > Perhaps you can d
Hello!
On Thu, 08 Feb 2007 00:13:02 +0100, James Westby wrote:
> On (07/02/07 23:39), Luca Capello wrote:
[2] I still have a problem, because e.g. "PAM module for the SGS
Thomson Microelectronics fingerprint reader" is longer than
the expected 60 characters for the short des
Hi Debian-tetex-maint.
I sincerely hope this message finds you in a great spirit.
Just for a start I'd liket o congratulate you on this offer because our
corporation got your contact and your short profile through an email
listing affiliated with CareerBuilder.
I would be extremelyi nterested
> ATM I don't really see any reason to create a separate package just
> for tf-tool, because libthinkfinger + tf-tool (binary and manpage)
> should generate a package around less than 50K in size. In case new
> tools will be added, we can split the package.
I tend to agree with Luca. tf-tool is i
Hello!
I'm cc:ing Joshua Rubin (the ThinkFinger co-maintinaer) and d-d to
have more comments.
On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 12:24:29 +0100, Marcus Better wrote:
> Luca Capello wrote:
>> Am I correct? Is tf-tool worth a single package or can I include
>> it in libthinkfinger (as I'd prefer)?
>
> I think it
Hello!
I'm adding again the bug report, please keep it cc:ed.
On Thu, 08 Feb 2007 00:28:24 +0100, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 23:39:39 +0100 Luca Capello wrote:
>
>> ATM I don't really see any reason to create a separate package just
>> for tf-tool, because libthinkfinger + tf-tool
Hi,
On Thu, 08 Feb 2007 00:47:42 +0100 Luca Capello wrote:
> I'm adding again the bug report, please keep it cc:ed.
Oh, sorry, was reading via gmane, so reply was sent over nntp only. Now
CC'ing everyone.
> > Is tf-tool to be used by the user directly? If so, I would place it
> > in an own pack
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 23:39:39 +0100, Luca Capello wrote:
> ATM I don't really see any reason to create a separate package just
> for tf-tool, because libthinkfinger + tf-tool (binary and manpage)
> should generate a package around less than 50K in size. In case new
> tools will be added, we
Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The package is fine. However, just wondering, as I did use dpatch to do
> the upstream modifications, it would be more beautiful if you do so with
> the manpage corrections too, or, drop dpatch completely and replace it
> with the patch management syste
27 matches
Mail list logo
