> > Morten> I'm not involved in the packaging of pysnmp, but I guess
> > Morten> packaging the 3.x- 4.x-series as separate packages sounds
> > Morten> like a good idea if we really want the version 3 and 4 in
> > Morten> Debian before upstream freezes their API.
> >
> > I think so
Mario Iseli wrote:
> Hello David,
>
> what's the state of this ITP? Are you maybe interested in someone
> helping you to maintain this package?
Please feel free to take the ITP on your own. Not too much time from my
part nowadays.
Thanks for caring,
--
David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 09:19:39PM +0200, Marco Cabizza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> * Package name: gaim-libnotify
How is work going on packaging gaim-libnotify? Can we find the
preliminary packages somewhere?
Thanks,
Adriaan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 263051 O: sourcenav -- Source code analysis, editor, browser and
> build tool
Bug#263051: O: sourcenav -- Source code analysis, editor, browser
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assis
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Pierre-Matthieu Alamy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libtie-encryptedhash-perl
Version : 1.21
Upstream Author : Vipul Ved Prakash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://cpan.org/modules/by-module/Tie/
* License : Artist
The package is available through the repository of the Bulgarian Debian
Group:
deb http://ftp.uni-sofia.bg/debian-addons-bg ./
deb-src http://ftp.uni-sofia.bg/debian-addons-bg ./
--
"Every non-free program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." --RMS
--
To UN
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 04:08:55 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#342134: fixed in popplerkit.framework 0.0.20051227svn-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Pierre-Matthieu Alamy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libconvert-ascii-armour-perl
Version : 1.4
Upstream Author : Vipul Ved Prakash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://cpan.org/modules/by-module/Convert/
* License :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Pierre-Matthieu Alamy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libclass-loader-perl
Version : 2.03
Upstream Author : Vipul Ved Prakash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://cpan.org/modules/by-module/Class/
* License : Artistic
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 04:27:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#274726: fixed in epylog 1.0.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 04:15:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325753: fixed in libmthca 1.0.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 04:41:22 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#361342: fixed in lasi 1.0.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 04:46:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#361429: fixed in libtext-bibtex-perl 0.36-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 11:37 +0400, Ilya Etingof wrote:
> > v4 contains a mechanism to select the required version before importing
> > pysnmp. So it should be possible to port this mechanism to v2 and v3 and
> > create a pysnmp-common package which contains this module.
>
> If anyone wants to back
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 02:00:20PM +0200, Jan Lübbe wrote:
> We could do it like this:
>
> - pysnmp2 is patched to install to pysnmp/v2
> - pysnmp3 is patched to install to pysnmp/v3
> - pysnmp4 already installs to pysnmp/v4
> - the version switch-module from v4 is packaged as pysnmp-common and t
> We could do it like this:
>
> - pysnmp2 is patched to install to pysnmp/v2
> - pysnmp3 is patched to install to pysnmp/v3
> - pysnmp4 already installs to pysnmp/v4
> - the version switch-module from v4 is packaged as pysnmp-common and the
> other version depend on it
> - Programs need to specify
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 14:06 +0200, Morten Werner Olsen wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 02:00:20PM +0200, Jan Lübbe wrote:
>
> > We could do it like this:
> >
> > - pysnmp2 is patched to install to pysnmp/v2
> > - pysnmp3 is patched to install to pysnmp/v3
> > - pysnmp4 already installs to pysnmp
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 05:21:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#353931: fixed in exscalibar 1.0.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.14bpo1
> tags 352541 = pending
Bug#352541: ITA: rosegarden4 -- music editor and MIDI/audio sequencer
Tags were: patch
Tags set to: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Ple
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the lirc package.
The package description is:
This package provides the daemons and some utilities to support infra-red
remote controls under Linux.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT poli
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Satoru Takeuchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: quilt-el
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.selenic.com/quilt/quilt.el
* License : GPL
Description : a simple Emacs
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi,
After seven and a half years of maintaining Gnus, I am having
to give away the package, on what I consider is a matter of
principle. My upload removing non-DFSG bits was rejected, on the
grounds that the upload renamed the source package name (the bi
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 07:44:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#361291: fixed in libdata-dumpxml-perl 1.06-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libmoose-perl
Version : 0.04
Upstream Author : Stevan Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~stevan/Moose-0.04/
* License : Perl: Artist
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
This is The Qualcomm enhanced version of the Post Office Protocol
Daemon (POP3 daemon), based on the latest BSD version. The QualComm
popper has some extensions to the normal pop3 daemon, such as UIDL and
bulletin support.
I didn't use it in my server for a lon
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Creates crosslinked and threaded HTML archives of mailboxes or mailing
lists. Can be configured to automagically update the archives when new
messages arrive.
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 07:35:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304625: fixed in libtemplate-multilingual-perl 0.06-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 07:38:27 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#361279: fixed in libarray-refelem-perl 1.00-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 08:11:56 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#361754: fixed in libezv24 0.1.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
On 10634 March 1977, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> I find myself unable to comply with calling the source package
> Gnus, even though we remove all documentation from the package, and
> pretending it is just a newer upstream version, since that implies to
> people looking at the list of sou
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 08:06:35 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#188608: fixed in xmms-speex 0.9.2b-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 08:23:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#361295: fixed in libdvdread 0.9.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 08:22:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334927: fixed in hoichess 0.4.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 08:19:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#361662: fixed in zope-cachefu 0.99+1.0beta-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
> Package gnus, version x.y-z.dfsg.
> That way its clearly marked that gnus is modified to be dfsg free,
> and you dont change any source/package name. A lot of other packages
> in Debian already go this way, I dont see why gnus can't do it.
In Debian, source package components have preci
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 08:19:34 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#361761: fixed in libcgi-application-plugins-perl 0.01
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 08:23:47 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#361098: fixed in libdata-structure-util-perl 0.11-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 09:17:26 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#280094: fixed in wackamole 2.1.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 09:17:21 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#280087: fixed in spread 3.17.3-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 09:17:21 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#280087: fixed in spread 3.17.3-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 09:17:26 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#280094: fixed in wackamole 2.1.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On 24 Apr 2006, Bernhard R. Link spake thusly:
> * Bernhard R. Link <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060424 18:14]:
>> * Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060424 17:39]:
>>>
Package gnus, version x.y-z.dfsg. That way its clearly marked
that gnus is modified to be dfsg free, and you dont change
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:59:37 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:59:37 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:59:52 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:59:38 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Hi
Are you still interested in adopting this package?
Regards,
// Ola
--
--- Ola Lundqvist systemkonsult --- M Sc in IT Engineering
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37\
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD|
| http://www.opal.d
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:59:38 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Hi,
just pinging -- what's the current state? And are the package on
http://carwash.cs.nott.ac.uk:992/~lyh/gtk2hs/
the ones that will be uploaded eventually?
Thanks,
Joachim
--
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
JID: [EMAIL
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:59:53 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:59:52 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:59:52 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Luigi Gangitano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: squid3
Version : 3.0-PRE3.20060422
Upstream Author : Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.squid-cache.org
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Des
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:59:38 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:59:53 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:59:37 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:59:37 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:59:52 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:59:52 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:59:52 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:59:39 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:59:53 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: python-pywbem
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Tim Potter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://pywbem.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : Python WBEM client
PyWBEM is a Python library that implem
Excellent progress, John! Send me a .diff.gz, .dsc, .deb, and
.changes, just as soon as you have them. After looking 'em over, I'll
sponsor the upload changing maintainership of the package and advocate
for you.
Cheers,
Shaun
On 4/24/06, John Bovey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shaun,
>
> I have s
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 20:28 +0200, Luigi Gangitano wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Luigi Gangitano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: squid3
> Version : 3.0-PRE3.20060422
> Upstream Author : Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This should be [EMAIL PROTE
Doh - that should be version 0.4 of PyWBEM to be packaged.
Tim.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 364609 ITA: Gnus -- A versatile News and mailing list reader for
> Emacsen.
Bug#364609: O: Gnus -- A versatile News and mailing list reader for Emacsen.
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assis
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 364675 ITP: python-pywbem -- Python WBEM client
Bug#364675: RFP: python-pywbem -- Python WBEM client
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administr
retitle 364609 ITA: Gnus -- A versatile News and mailing list reader for
Emacsen.
thanks
Unless anyone, particularly the former maintainer, objects I'll adopt
this package. It's my MUA of choice (has been for years) and I'm
entirely reliant on it anyway, so maintaining it shouldn't be too much
o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, Rob!
Il giorno 25/apr/06, alle ore 00:13, Robert Collins ha scritto:
Upstream Author : Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This should be [EMAIL PROTECTED] Henrik is one of the core
developers, but not the only one!
Thanks, was just too l
70 matches
Mail list logo
