Your message dated Sat, 5 Jul 2003 08:00:41 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop
ftpmaster has rejected this "silly package". So it does not look like
it will be in Debian soon.
In my opinion, this is a disturbingly bad case of non-appreciation of
developer's work by ftpmaster, an instance that has far too much power
in the Debian project.
If you think this package should be
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-05
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the wmweather+ package.
The package description is:
wmweather+ provides a monitor on a 64x64 mini window that displays the
current weather conditions, forecast data (US only), and optionally a
rada
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 07:35:15AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>
> > This applications mixes two incompatible (advertising requirement 4-clause
> > BSD & GPL) licenses.
>
> I have tried to contact upstream about license changes;
> without response so far, as far as I can remember.
Which is mos
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-05
Severity: normal
Due to lack of interest in this package, and no need to use it at all, I
request a new maintainer for asp.
Description: Discovers present ip-address of dynamically connected hosts.
Asp discovers the present ip address of a
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-05
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: tkgamma
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Pixel Fairy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://pixel.fairyden.net/tkgamma/
* License : GPL
Description : A simple color c
FYI
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/admin/ibackup.html
Automated backups (even remote) of machine configurations
This software simplifies the task of backing up the system configuration
files (those under /etc) for UNIX systems (Solaris, *BSD, Linux). You
can run the program from any directo
Your message dated Sat, 05 Jul 2003 09:47:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#189810: fixed in slmon 0.5.12-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-07-05
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: makeself
Version : 2.1
Upstream Author : Stéphane Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.megastep.org/makeself/
* License : GPL
Description : generates self-extractibl
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-05
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: e2tools
Version : 0.0.13
Upstream Author : Keith Sheffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://home.earthlink.net/~k_sheff/sw/e2tools/index.html
* License : GPL
Descripti
Your message dated Sat, 05 Jul 2003 11:03:11 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#190069: fixed in kmymoney2 0.5.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Dear Loren,
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 10:54:26PM -0400, Loren Bandiera wrote:
> I actually wanted to release .debs of sussen with the 0.4 release, but I
> couldn't find a way to make .debs on a Gentoo box.
A really dodgy way of doing it is to run alien on RPMs to convert them,
but the packages pr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
This is Python Unicode codec using iconv(). It supports all
the encodings which are provided by iconv().
URL: http://http://sourceforge.net/projects/koco/
License: BSD (without the advertising clause)
Your message dated Sat, 05 Jul 2003 13:32:30 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#185988: fixed in magpie 0.5.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-05
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: png2ico
Version : 20021208
Upstream Author : Matthias Benkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.winterdrache.de/freeware/png2ico/
* License : GPL
Description :
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 09:26:02PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.07.05.2119 +0200]:
> > There are already plenty of utils in the archive to trivially
> > convert between pngs and xpms. Which should be a wrapper of which
> > is probably a quest
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 08:45:53PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-05
> Severity: wishlist
> * Package name: png2ico
> Version : 20021208
> Upstream Author : Matthias Benkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://ww
also sprach Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.07.05.2113 +0200]:
> Is there a reason the existing xpm2wico package is unsuitable for
> this? Perhaps a wrapper script around xpm2wico could be used to
> accomplish the same thing, or the two utilities could be shipped
> in a single package?
Th
Mldonkey made sid, enjoy.
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 09:16:57PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.07.05.2113 +0200]:
> > Is there a reason the existing xpm2wico package is unsuitable for
> > this? Perhaps a wrapper script around xpm2wico could be used to
> > accomplish the sam
also sprach Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.07.05.2119 +0200]:
> There are already plenty of utils in the archive to trivially
> convert between pngs and xpms. Which should be a wrapper of which
> is probably a question of which tool is more mature, and whether
> any of the conversion pat
also sprach Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.07.05.2130 +0200]:
> Honestly, I don't know. I got the package from an 'apt-cache
> search' upon seeing this ITP, because it surprised me that we
> wouldn't already have a tool in the archive that can handle
> .ico's. (Actually, we have two --
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 09:35:35PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
|| also sprach Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.07.05.2130 +0200]:
|| > Honestly, I don't know. I got the package from an 'apt-cache
|| > search' upon seeing this ITP, because it surprised me that we
|| > wouldn't alread
Your message dated Sat, 5 Jul 2003 22:43:46 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#200163: ITP: png2ico -- command-line PNG to ICO converter
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 05:24:21PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-05
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: e2tools
> Version : 0.0.13
> Upstream Author : Keith Sheffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://home.e
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-07-05
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: pathological
Version : 1.1.1
Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://pathological.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : A puzzle game involving pa
Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > E2tools is a simple set of GPL'ed utilities to read, write, and
> > manipulate files in an ext2/ext3 filesystem.
>
> please excuse my ignorance - what would be the advantage of these
> tools over the core file utilities which use the VFS layer?
You do
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 11:57:35PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> > > E2tools is a simple set of GPL'ed utilities to read, write, and
> > > manipulate files in an ext2/ext3 filesystem.
> >
> > please excuse my ignorance - what would be the advantage of these
> > tools over the core file utilities w
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-07-05
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: autospeedstep
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Fritz Ganter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://http://gpsdrive.kraftvoll.at/speedstep.shtml
* License : GPL
Description : Cont
Your message dated Sat, 05 Jul 2003 21:02:38 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#199250: fixed in recover 1.3c-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 199548 -1
Bug#199548: asterisk: Please add libpri support
Bug 199548 cloned as bug 200188.
> reassign -1 wnpp
Bug#200188: asterisk: Please add libpri support
Bug reassigned from package `asterisk' to `wnpp'.
> retitle -1 RFP: libpri -- Primary R
31 matches
Mail list logo
