Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-02-15
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: aolserver-misc
Version : many
Upstream Author : AOLserver folks ()
* URL : http://aolserver.sf.net/
* License : Mozilla
Description : Various modules for aolserver 3
Hi, folks.
I'll try to explain my point of view on koffice-i18n. It's very simple: if we
have kde and koffice (separate) packages, with different release cycles and
so, why should we package koffice-i18n and kde-i18n together?
Well, I have just take the same philosophy of work from Noel and kde
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
URL: http://ezix.sourceforge.net/software/lshw.html
License: GPL
The package is almost complete already.
Regards,
// Ola
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \
|
Hi
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 02:26:02AM +0200, Egle Girinaite wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >When packaging it I got some problems though. It segfaults.
> >Right now I do not have the time to track it down.
> >
> >If someone fix that the pakage is almost already done.
> I'll try to explain my point of view on koffice-i18n. It's very simple: if we
> have kde and koffice (separate) packages, with different release cycles and
> so, why should we package koffice-i18n and kde-i18n together?
You're right, it's a bad solution. The problem is that the other
solutio
> Upstream authors prefer to wait for the final version of libolena
> before adding it in debian.
>
> So this package will probably not be released before end of 2002.
Current version is 0.6, the final version will probably be released at
the end of 2003.
packages at http://people.debian.org/~s
On 20030215T111517+1100, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
> But now I have contacted you
No, you haven't. You have posted some stuff to some obscure bug report
which forwards the mail to some obscure list that I by chance happen to
follow, occasionally. If it weren't election time (the obscure list
gets s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 179330 ITP: source-highlight -- Produce a document with syntax
> highlighting.
Bug#179330: RFP: source-highlight -- Produce a document with syntax
highlighting.
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you n
retitle 179330 ITP: source-highlight -- Produce a document with syntax
highlighting.
thanks
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 04:09:01PM +0100, Klaus Alexander Seistrup wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: unavailable; reported 2003-02-01
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
> * Package name: source-highlight
> V
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-02-15
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: hbd
Version : 0.2.2
Upstream Author : Pete Ryland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://pdr.cx/projects/hbd/
* License : GPL
Description : Fast Java Decompiler written
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-02-15
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: printman
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : Dave Camp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Damon Chaplin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Alex Graveley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 07:10:36PM +0100, Klaus Alexander Seistrup wrote:
> Hej Ola
>
> > retitle 179330 ITP: source-highlight -- Produce a document with syntax
> > highlighting.
>
> Tak, tak. :-)
Varsågod.
(Translated: You are welcome)
I'll upload the package today so it will be available so
Hi
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 06:36:38PM +, Ross Burton wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: unavailable; reported 2003-02-15
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: printman
> Version : 0.0.1
> Upstream Author : Dave Camp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Damon Chaplin <[EMA
This one time, at band camp, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
>On 20030215T111517+1100, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
>> But now I have contacted you
>
>No, you haven't. You have posted some stuff to some obscure bug report
>which forwards the mail to some obscure list that I by chance happen to
>follow, oc
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 10:49:23AM +1100, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> >On 20030215T111517+1100, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
> >> But now I have contacted you
> >
> >No, you haven't. You have posted some stuff to some obscure bug report
> >which
> From file LICENCE:
>
> | Alliance is freely available under the terms of the GNU General
>
> | Public License. Please read the files COPYING-2.0 and COPYING.LIB-2.0.
>
> | (More info at http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/) Alliance
16 matches
Mail list logo
