On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 11:53:48AM -0300, Pedro Zorzenon Neto wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: N/A; reported 2002-03-10
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: msp430-tools
> Version : the project is still in "alpha" stage. need to write
> to authors and tell th
Hello,
at
http://bugs.debian.org/82
you inteded to package imaze 189 days ago. Are there any problems in
packaging the game? Do you need any help in packaging?
I'm interested in this game and Klaus Knopper, the developer of the
great Knoppix Live-CD (just have a look at it - it is
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A
Severity: wishlist
Description: Perl interface to the zlib compression library.
This Perl module provides an interface to the info-zip zlib compression
library.
It was downloaded from http://cpan.perl.org/modules/by-module/Compress
Copyright (c) 1995-2001 Paul Marque
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 01:57:35PM +0100, Tille, Andreas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> at
>
>http://bugs.debian.org/82
>
> you inteded to package imaze 189 days ago. Are there any problems in
> packaging the game? Do you need any help in packaging?
The version I made comes with a dialog/gdi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 138002
Bug#138002: ITP: libcompress-zlib-perl -- perl interface to the zlib
compression library
Bug closed, send any further explanations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> thanks.
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
This module implements an HTML widget with multiple layers. Only one
layer is visible at any given time, controlled by a box. For an
example see http://www.420.am/selectlayers/
--
_ivan
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 02:57:33PM +0100, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> Description: Perl interface to the zlib compression library.
> This Perl module provides an interface to the info-zip zlib compression
> library.
This is already packaged.
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 48562
Bug#48562: translations of manpages and manpages-xx packages
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> reopen 48562 !
Bug#48562: translations of manpages and manpages-xx packages
Bug reopened, originato
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-03-12
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: PPower4
* URL : http://www.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/support/ppower4/readme.html
* License : GPL
PPower4 is used to post process (La)TeX files formatted with
pdf(la)tex to be able to bu
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Klaus Knopper wrote:
> The version I made comes with a dialog/gdialog frontend to start the
> server with different options. You can download the debian package I
> made at http://www.knopper.net/knoppix/sources/
Thanks Klaus, I'll check it at the weekend.
> I don't know id t
On Mon, 2002-03-11 at 20:36, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> I do not oppose the package itself, but could it be given a more obvious name?
How about 'pm-base' ?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 12-Mar-2002 Thomas Hood wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-03-11 at 20:36, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>> I do not oppose the package itself, but could it be given a more obvious
>> name?
>
> How about 'pm-base' ?
>
no, it is the 'pm' part that is confusing. -common, -base, -essential. Name
it how you l
On Tue, 2002-03-12 at 11:01, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> no, it is the 'pm' part that is confusing. -common, -base, -essential. Name
> it how you like. But the name 'pm-common' or 'pm-base' tells me nothing about
> the package or why anacron or apmd want it.
What name do you suggest?
signatu
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-03-12
Severity: normal
I intend to orphan the gide package.
The package description is:
gIDE is meant to aid users with development work. It provides an
editor with syntax hilightlighting, a rudimentary project/build
system and an interface to the gdb d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 135690 + fixed
Bug#135690: ITA: php4-pgsql -- PostgreSQL module for php4
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Your message dated Tue, 12 Mar 2002 15:43:19 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line crazy NMU rules
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
I am preparing to start the new maintainer process (reading all required
docs, etc) and I would like to adopt this package. I'm not retitling
this yet due to advice I have received on the debian-mentors list.
--
Bill Jonas*[EMAIL PROTECTED]*http://www.billjonas.com/
Developer/Sy
The name of this package has been provisionally changed
to pm-base. Unless someone suggests something better,
that's what we'll use.
--
Thomas Hood
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-03-13
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: mytop
Version : 0.8
Upstream Author : Jeremy D. Zawodny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://public.yahoo.com/~jzawodn/mytop/
* License : GPL
Description : mytop - a top clone
Your message dated Wed, 13 Mar 2002 00:23:27 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line qm has been uploaded
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-03-12
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the gtkfind package.
The package description is:
This package provides a graphical file finding program.
This program is no longer maintained upstream, and I no longer use it.
It has build-issues on the Hur
Your message dated Wed, 13 Mar 2002 00:02:00 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line vm-pop3d ITP
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> The name of this package has been provisionally changed
> to pm-base. Unless someone suggests something better,
> that's what we'll use.
Why does it need to be abbreviated ?
Is "powermanagement-base" not an option?
If it's a package that
On Tue, 2002-03-12 at 19:53, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Is "powermanagement-base" not an option?
> If it's a package that normal users won't install directly,
> it won't cause too much trouble, even if the package name is longish.
Can you come up with a shorter suggestion?
signature.asc
Descriptio
24 matches
Mail list logo
