Re: Work-needing packages report for Sep 3, 2004

2005-05-19 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-04 03:04]: > This is what I intend to do: Jeroen van Wolffelaar supported my proposal and nobody objected so I'll go ahead with this now. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "

Re: Work-needing packages report for Sep 3, 2004

2005-05-04 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 03:04:19AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > This is what I intend to do: > > - send the weekly posting to debian-wnpp instead of d-d-a > > - only include new entries (and provide a link to the web pages >listing all packages) I 100% agree with this plan, and the rat

Re: Work-needing packages report for Sep 3, 2004

2005-05-03 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Norbert Veber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-09-03 10:52]: > Suggestion - I can't speak for others buy every time I get this > email, I just simply search for the words "NEW", and look at only I agree that the weekly postings of the WNPP list to d-d-a is probably not very effective. I personally del

Re: Work-needing packages report for Sep 3, 2004

2004-09-04 Thread Joey Hess
Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > Hmm... debconf is a good example why I put the reverse depends on that > list. It's an eye-popper. "Whoa! Something's wrong here!" But > debconf's case is special. Yep. FWIW, debconf will be co-maintained by a team, probably Otavio Salvador, Colin Watson, David N

Re: Work-needing packages report for Sep 3, 2004

2004-09-04 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Sep 04, 2004 at 09:55:15AM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: >guppi (#188498), orphaned 511 days ago > Description: GNOME graph and plot component, interface to gnumeric > Reverse Depends: libguppi-dev gnucash > I've actually asked myself what's going on here a couple of tim

Re: Work-needing packages report for Sep 3, 2004

2004-09-04 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 10:52:45AM -0400, Norbert Veber wrote: > Suggestion - I can't speak for others buy every time I get this > email, I just simply search for the words "NEW", and look at only the > new entries. What is the point of sending out a list of all packages > over and over each

Re: Work-needing packages report for Sep 3, 2004

2004-09-03 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 10:52:45AM -0400, Norbert Veber wrote: > Take for example the following: > > >vmnet (#181273), offered 564 days ago > > Description: A simple virtual networking program > > > >xae (#179566), offered 578 days ago > > Description: XML authoring environment

Re: Work-needing packages report for Sep 3, 2004

2004-09-03 Thread Norbert Veber
Suggestion - I can't speak for others buy every time I get this email, I just simply search for the words "NEW", and look at only the new entries. What is the point of sending out a list of all packages over and over each week? The list is now over 1100 lines long! I would suggest only sending