Bug#96694: wnpp: majordomo/majordomo2

2005-09-26 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Drew Scott Daniels in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > reopen 96694 = > thanks Oh well. Nobody did package it during the last 2 (4) years. Please let that RFP just die... Christoph -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/cs/ Universität des Saarlandes, Compiler Design Lab signature.asc Description

Bug#96694: wnpp: majordomo/majordomo2

2005-09-26 Thread Stephen Frost
* Drew Scott Daniels ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I'm just wondering if Majordomo/Majordomo2 would still be a useful > package in Debian given that there's things like mailman, fml, ecartis > and potentially other alternatives. Erm, yes, of course it'd be a useful package to have in Debian.

Bug#96694: wnpp: majordomo/majordomo2

2005-09-25 Thread David Moreno Garza
On Sun, 2005-09-25 at 22:22 -0500, Drew Scott Daniels wrote: > Hi, > I'm just wondering if Majordomo/Majordomo2 would still be a useful > package in Debian given that there's things like mailman, fml, ecartis > and potentially other alternatives. May I say alternatives rock the world? Besides, Ma

Bug#96694: wnpp: majordomo/majordomo2

2005-09-25 Thread Drew Scott Daniels
Hi, I'm just wondering if Majordomo/Majordomo2 would still be a useful package in Debian given that there's things like mailman, fml, ecartis and potentially other alternatives. Drew Daniels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E