That's great news! Thank you Seunghun for acting on it so promptly. Cheers.
Hi all,
I'm so sorry for letting you wait. I have packaged and uploaded it to
mentors.debian.net [1]. I also have sent the RFS [2] to the mailing list. I
hope one of Debian developers supports it to get involved in sid.
Best regards,
Seunghun
[1]: https://mentors.debian.net/package/swtpm/
[2]:
Is anyone looking into this? I sense increasing demand for swtpm +
qemu for Win 11 VM.
What happened to this? What exactly is the bottleneck and is there any room to
help get this over the line?
Considering Windows 11 VMs pretty much require TPM and this is necessary for
that through libvirt I think it's something that should we should try to get in
the repo before the Windows 11
I've sent pull requests [1, 2] to the maintainer to upgrade his
work-in-progress packages to the latest upstream versions, as well as
overhaul the Debian packaging--these should be pretty much
production-quality now. I upstreamed some of the patches while I was
at it, too.
Additionally, I've creat
Hey guys,
is there anything news or a ETA?
3 months later and still not a package available.
Cheers,
fossdd
Hi Seunghun,
> Thank you for the notification. I am still working on this and
> would finish it soon.
Let me know if you need some kind of help or something. I'll be happy
to help and thanks for working on this!
- u
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 2:16 AM Andreas Metzler wrote:
>
> Control: unblock 941199 by 958509
>
> On 2020-04-17 Seunghun Han wrote:
> [...]
> > Dear Laurent Bigonville and Christian Ehrhardt,
>
> > I would like to package this one.
>
> > Best regards,
>
> Hello Seunghun,
>
> are you still working
Control: unblock 941199 by 958509
On 2020-04-17 Seunghun Han wrote:
[...]
> Dear Laurent Bigonville and Christian Ehrhardt,
> I would like to package this one.
> Best regards,
Hello Seunghun,
are you still working on this or should I retitle this to ITP?
cu Andreas
--
`What a good friend yo
Processing control commands:
> unblock 941199 by 958509
Bug #941199 [wnpp] ITP: swtpm -- TPM Emulator for TPM 1.2 and 2.0
No valid blocking bug(s) given; not doing anything
Failed to set blocking bugs of 941199: Unknown/archived blocking bug(s):958509.
--
941199: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin
On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 12:44:42 +0100 Christian Ehrhardt
wrote:
> Hi,
> since [1] seems to have valid packaging content and I've had a few users
> reporting to use that for a while and it works well. Therefore I wanted to
> ask what this might be missing - just someone who does the dput or was
> there
Hi,
since [1] seems to have valid packaging content and I've had a few users
reporting to use that for a while and it works well. Therefore I wanted to
ask what this might be missing - just someone who does the dput or was
there more going on in the background that is missing here?
P.S. I did a si
12 matches
Mail list logo
