Bug#93561: ITA bf-utf

2002-01-07 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Nicolas SABOURET <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" wrote: > > > > Hi Nicolas, > > > > Do you still intend to adopt this package? > > > > If yes, please upload a package; > > If no, please change this WNPP bug back to RFA:. > > Your mail makes me realize that I haven't been w

Bug#93561: ITA bf-utf

2002-01-07 Thread Nicolas SABOURET
"Thomas Bushnell, BSG" wrote: > > Hi Nicolas, > > Do you still intend to adopt this package? > > If yes, please upload a package; > If no, please change this WNPP bug back to RFA:. Your mail makes me realize that I haven't been working much on this package and that I have no real improvement to

Bug#93561: ITA bf-utf

2002-01-03 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Hi Nicolas, Do you still intend to adopt this package? If yes, please upload a package; If no, please change this WNPP bug back to RFA:. Thanks, Thomas

Bug#93561: ITA bf-utf

2001-10-02 Thread David Kimdon
Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 03:34:43PM +0200 wrote: > I'll maintain this package from now on (if everybody's OK with that). Great, I'm glad to hear it :-) > I do not want to make any major change right now. However, I intend to > add Recommands:boot-floppies since I don't see why you would have bf-utf >

Bug#93561: ITA bf-utf

2001-10-02 Thread Nicolas SABOURET
I'll maintain this package from now on (if everybody's OK with that). I do not want to make any major change right now. However, I intend to add Recommands:boot-floppies since I don't see why you would have bf-utf installed if you don't intend to make bootfloppies. -- Nicolas SABOURET LIMSI-CNRS,