On Saturday, December 24 2016, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On ഞായര് 25 ഡിസംബര് 2016 12:01 രാവിലെ, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>> Yep, I did it before building pagure.
>
> It is failing here on sbuild as well.
OK, managed to reproduce it here.
--
Sergio
GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF 31F4
On ഞായര് 25 ഡിസംബര് 2016 12:01 രാവിലെ, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> Yep, I did it before building pagure.
It is failing here on sbuild as well.
aviau, can you try to build it?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On ശനി 24 ഡിസംബര് 2016 11:58 വൈകു, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> Hm, strange. I'm using pbuilder/cowdancer to build the package, so it
> should catch this. I'll look into it.
Did you update pbuilder recently? You have to run 'pbuilder update' often.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digit
On Saturday, December 24 2016, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On ശനി 24 ഡിസംബര് 2016 11:58 വൈകു, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>> Hm, strange. I'm using pbuilder/cowdancer to build the package, so it
>> should catch this. I'll look into it.
>
> Did you update pbuilder recently? You have to run 'pbuilde
On Saturday, December 24 2016, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On ശനി 24 ഡിസംബര് 2016 07:26 വൈകു, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>> Yep, I forgot :-/. Anyway, pushed now. Sorry about that.
>
> I'm still getting the same error,
>
> from html5lib.sanitizer import HTMLSanitizer
> ImportError: No module name
On ശനി 24 ഡിസംബര് 2016 07:26 വൈകു, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> Yep, I forgot :-/. Anyway, pushed now. Sorry about that.
I'm still getting the same error,
from html5lib.sanitizer import HTMLSanitizer
ImportError: No module named sanitizer
I don't see either python-bleach or python-html5lib
On Saturday, December 24 2016, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On ശനി 24 ഡിസംബര് 2016 11:37 രാവിലെ, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>> Well, I've done some tests here and I think I have a package that
>> builds. I've updated pagure to an intermediary version, 2.6, and the
>> package builds fine on pbuilder
On ശനി 24 ഡിസംബര് 2016 11:37 രാവിലെ, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> Right, that's nice indeed, but it demands work anyway... But it's
> really good that grunt and gulp are now available.
Exploding dependencies in new releases is not pagure specific issue. Its
there for every web app, be it gitla
On ശനി 24 ഡിസംബര് 2016 11:37 രാവിലെ, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> Well, I've done some tests here and I think I have a package that
> builds. I've updated pagure to an intermediary version, 2.6, and the
> package builds fine on pbuilder/cowbuilder using the latest unstable.
> You can find it he
On Saturday, December 24 2016, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On ശനി 24 ഡിസംബര് 2016 10:54 രാവിലെ, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>> IMO, if you have time, here's what I would do:
>>
>> - If you manage to get the building issue sorted out, and if there are
>> no other critical issues, then I think the
On ശനി 24 ഡിസംബര് 2016 10:54 രാവിലെ, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> IMO, if you have time, here's what I would do:
>
> - If you manage to get the building issue sorted out, and if there are
> no other critical issues, then I think the package is "good enough"
> (for a very relaxed definition
On Tuesday, December 20 2016, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On തിങ്കള് 19 ഡിസംബര് 2016 11:07 വൈകു, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>> Things are starting to calm down, and I intend to get back to packaging
>> pagure. My intention is to get the latest version imported onto my
>> repository and work on it
On തിങ്കള് 19 ഡിസംബര് 2016 11:07 വൈകു, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> Things are starting to calm down, and I intend to get back to packaging
> pagure. My intention is to get the latest version imported onto my
> repository and work on it. However, I don't think it will be possible
> to finish
On Monday, December 19 2016, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 06:21:35 +1100 Ben Finney wrote:
>> I don't understand Grunt or Gulp, but from what I could tell those
>> were just being used for typical build tasks. I do understand Make, so
>> I reproduced the build tasks in Debian's â
Control: block -1 by 844943
On തിങ്കള് 19 ഡിസംബര് 2016 05:55 വൈകു, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> When I try to build the package, I get the following error
>
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/bleach/__init__.py", line 8, in
>
> from html5lib.sanitizer import HTMLSanitizer
> ImportError: N
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 844943
Bug #829046 [wnpp] ITP: pagure -- A git centered forge
829046 was blocked by: 836409 836406 836407 829153 836408
829046 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 829046: 844943
--
829046: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug
[ccing everyone who showed interest]
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 16:35:07 +0530 Pirate Praveen
wrote:
> Since Sergio has been silent for sometime and freeze is approaching fast
> (we have only time till Dec 25, less than a week to get pagure into
> stretch), I will copy his repo to collab-maint and will
On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 06:21:35 +1100 Ben Finney wrote:
> I don't understand Grunt or Gulp, but from what I could tell those
> were just being used for typical build tasks. I do understand Make, so
> I reproduced the build tasks in Debian's ârulesâ makefile :-)
Btw I just uploaded gulp also to d
On 05-Sep-2016, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> […] from my recent experience packaging some JS libs, I fear that
> the building issue will not be solved in the near future.
I have packaged the two remaining JavaScript libraries that were
blocking this RFP, ‘jquery-at.js’ and ‘jquery-caret.js’.
I
19 matches
Mail list logo