On 2014-11-25, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2014-11-25, Peter Howard wrote:
>> we should start using a git repo for the debian-specific work.
>> Vagrant - can you set up a git repo for ZM and clone from ZM upstream?
>> We can then bring over the debian directory, apply the recent NMU
>> patches, a
On 2014-11-25, Peter Howard wrote:
> we should start using a git repo for the debian-specific work.
> Vagrant - can you set up a git repo for ZM and clone from ZM upstream?
> We can then bring over the debian directory, apply the recent NMU
> patches, and make that the basis for further work.
Yeah
On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 09:37 -0500, Isaac Connor wrote:
> On 2014-11-24 08:57 PM, Peter Howard wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-11-24 at 16:45 -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> >> On 2014-11-06, Isaac Connor wrote:
> >>> Our intention as upstream maintainers is to work with all distros to not
> >>> only make
On 2014-11-24 08:57 PM, Peter Howard wrote:
On Mon, 2014-11-24 at 16:45 -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
On 2014-11-06, Isaac Connor wrote:
Our intention as upstream maintainers is to work with all distros to not
only make zm as good as it can be, but to also minimize the effort on
the part of d
On Mon, 2014-11-24 at 16:45 -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2014-11-06, Isaac Connor wrote:
> > Our intention as upstream maintainers is to work with all distros to not
> > only make zm as good as it can be, but to also minimize the effort on
> > the part of distros to package it.
>
> Yes,
On 2014-11-06, Isaac Connor wrote:
> Our intention as upstream maintainers is to work with all distros to not
> only make zm as good as it can be, but to also minimize the effort on
> the part of distros to package it.
Yes, that's the one thing that made me consider continued
maintenance...
>
6 matches
Mail list logo