Bug#678870: marked as done (RFP: strace+ -- An improved version of strace that collects stack traces)

2018-09-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 678870: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678870 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wnpp

Bug#678870: strace+: changing back from ITP to RFP

2013-08-17 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 678870 RFP: strace+ -- An improved version of strace that collects stack traces noowner 678870 tag 678870 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging strace+. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a t

Bug#678870:

2012-07-21 Thread Alexander Toresson
I've been thinking about this for a while. I don't think it's a good idea to package in its current state: 1. The system libunwind should be used, to ease maintainability and application of security patches. This could probably be done quite easily. 2. There's no official release. This could also

Bug#678870:

2012-06-25 Thread Alexander Toresson
Darn it. Of course it should've read: "* Package name: strace+" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cam9mdpdtd1jzakskj029l+5uamc+4lguar5yjosbqrrqnmp.

Bug#678870: ITP: strace+ -- An improved version of strace that collects stack traces

2012-06-24 Thread Alexander Toresson
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Alexander Toresson * Package name: fceux Version : no release yet Upstream Author : Philip Guo * URL : http://code.google.com/p/strace-plus/ * License : New BSD License (http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php