I'd like to help, am in the source already figuring out why it's not
working for us.
Mark
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Ryan Kavanagh wrote:
> Hi Prach, Ansgar,
>
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 09:58:38PM +0700, Prach Pongpanich wrote:
>> > I am willing to continue to co-maintain the package and look after
>> > urgent issues should there be one (eg. FTBFS bugs), but will not do
>> > large
Hi Prach, Ansgar,
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 09:58:38PM +0700, Prach Pongpanich wrote:
> > I am willing to continue to co-maintain the package and look after
> > urgent issues should there be one (eg. FTBFS bugs), but will not do
> > larger changes. Please note that Debian is also upstream for this
Hi Ansgar,
> I am willing to continue to co-maintain the package and look after
> urgent issues should there be one (eg. FTBFS bugs), but will not do
> larger changes. Please note that Debian is also upstream for this
> package. There are some downstream patches that still need to be
> integrat
Control: noowner -1
Control: retitle -1 RFA: at -- Delayed job execution and batch processing
Reverting to RFA as I haven't heard anything for almost a year.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lis
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
As I spend most of my Debian-time with maintaining my other packages or
non-packaging work, I request an adopter for the at package.
I am willing to continue to co-maintain the package and look after
urgent issues should there be one (eg. FTBFS bugs), but will not d
6 matches
Mail list logo
