Hi Emmanuel/people,
[Let me know if putting 2 mailings in Cc is making too much noise.]
I'm looking for a sponsor for a 1st dependency I submitted on @mentors (
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=855941 )
A few others should follow to bring a running sbt, but I'd like to show
a first
On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 23:16:52 +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 18/11/2016 à 14:41, Frederic Bonnard a écrit :
>
> Hi Frederic,
>
> > There is much work to finalize this if that is ok, but indeed, before
> > continuing I'd like to know if I'm on the good path.
>
> This looks like a valid appro
Hi Marko and thanks for answering :)
> Sorry, I didn't try to understand the details of your latest effort, but
> just to give you a heads up - I was/have been working on packaging SBT
> too.
No problem with that, that may not be trivial and well explained
> A couple of months ago or so I start
Hi Marko,
Le 8/12/2016 à 21:56, Marko Dimjašević a écrit :
> In a nutshell, Emmanuel packaged Scala 2.10 because it's a dependency
> for SBT, and the scala package moved to 2.11.8 in the meantime. Me being
> a newbie wrt Debian packaging had a hard time using it in the form he
> made it available
Le 18/11/2016 à 14:41, Frederic Bonnard a écrit :
Hi Frederic,
> There is much work to finalize this if that is ok, but indeed, before
> continuing I'd like to know if I'm on the good path.
This looks like a valid approach. Did you use Scala 2.10 or 2.11 for
compiling SBT? If you have a worki
Hi Frederic,
On Thu, 2016-12-08 at 14:38 +0100, Frederic Bonnard wrote:
> Sorry to ping you on that again.
> Any one having feedback on the validity of that bootstrap process ? Mehdi ?
> Emmanuel ? :)
Sorry, I didn't try to understand the details of your latest effort, but
just to give you a hea
Sorry to ping you on that again.
Any one having feedback on the validity of that bootstrap process ? Mehdi ?
Emmanuel ? :)
Thanks,
F.
On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 14:41:27 +0100, Frederic Bonnard
wrote:
> Hello Mehdi/Emmanuel/all,
> back on that topic, I did some work and would need your feedback on
Hello Mehdi/Emmanuel/all,
back on that topic, I did some work and would need your feedback on it
before going further.
What Mehdi said in his last comment, inspired me the following :
For sbt source package, I created 4 "sources" tarball :
1. sbt_0.13.13~RC1.orig.tar.gz : this is the upstream
Hi,
On 05/01/2016 16:32, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> The "easiest" solution is probably to start with a non-free sbt package
> containing a prebuilt version of sbt, and then upload in main a sbt
> package depending on itself with the prebuilt sbt removed. I would use
> only one sbt package, instead of
Le 5/01/2016 15:58, Frederic Bonnard a écrit :
> Hi,
> as Medhi suggested to me, I'm forwarding my questions here to debian Java
> packaging team.
> (Medhi answered in the bug :
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=639910#89 )
> Any tip will be appreciated.
Hi Frederic,
Fabio Pir
Hi,
as Medhi suggested to me, I'm forwarding my questions here to debian Java
packaging team.
(Medhi answered in the bug :
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=639910#89 )
Any tip will be appreciated.
Thanks,
F.
> Hi,
> I'd be interested in packaging sbt in debian, and I saw the deb
11 matches
Mail list logo
