On Sun, 19 Aug 2012, Christoph Egger wrote:
Hi again
Faheem Mitha writes:
Could one just use upstream binaries instead? CCL has upstream
binaries available, which I use to initially build my Debian package,
for at least i386 and amd64. My package currently does not attempt to
build on any
Hi again
Faheem Mitha writes:
>>> 2) The main outstanding issue is how to handle the bootstrapping
>>> issue, namely that CCL is not in Debian, but requires CCL to compile.
>>
>> For sbcl I do bootstrapping with a crossbuild from another
>> architecture .. building just a non-packaged version an
Hi Christoph,
Thank you for your response. Feedback from members of Debian's Common Lisp
team is always helpful.
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012, Christoph Egger wrote:
Hi!
Please Send any mail also directly to me if you're interested in my
Input as I'm not reading -mentors regularly and pkg-common-l
Hi!
Please Send any mail also directly to me if you're interested in my
Input as I'm not reading -mentors regularly and pkg-common-lisp-devel@
is -- it appears -- not getting enough of my attention to see your
messages in time.
Faheem Mitha writes:
> 1) I'd like to take over the outstanding IT
Hi,
Please CC replies to my email address. Thanks.
I have put my preliminary packaging of CCL on Bitbucket as a Mercurial
repository, located at https://bitbucket.org/faheem/ccl-debian-tmp
Please test and report problem and suggest improvements. For
preference, open an issue.
This packaging is
5 matches
Mail list logo
