Bug#570709: packaging hhvm

2013-11-06 Thread GCS
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Paul Tarjan wrote: >>You have access to upstream source VCS? If not, an own Git repository >>under the hood of GitHub would be nice. It has the advantage that >>users may report bugs directly to FB. > > Ok, let me look into it. I liked pulling from theirs in the bui

Bug#570709: packaging hhvm

2013-11-06 Thread Paul Tarjan
>You have access to upstream source VCS? If not, an own Git repository >under the hood of GitHub would be nice. It has the advantage that >users may report bugs directly to FB. Ok, let me look into it. I liked pulling from theirs in the build instructions and it looked official. >But let me rewi

Bug#570709: packaging hhvm

2013-11-06 Thread GCS
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Paul Tarjan wrote: >>Can Facebook do the fork then? > > Sure. How do you want us to fork it? Our current method is pinning to a > tag in their branch and a .patch file. You have access to upstream source VCS? If not, an own Git repository under the hood of GitHub

Bug#727085: Bug#570709: packaging hhvm

2013-11-05 Thread Paul Tarjan
>Can Facebook do the fork then? Sure. How do you want us to fork it? Our current method is pinning to a tag in their branch and a .patch file. >Meanwhile I've packaged the latest 1.x >release with the HHVM patch applied[1]. I need to check if v1.x and >v2.y can live together though. >Does FB know

Bug#570709: packaging hhvm

2013-11-05 Thread GCS
Hi Paul, I'd other things, but back on track. On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Paul Tarjan wrote: >>On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Paul Tarjan wrote: >> That's very bad and raises several issues. The main one is that who >>will support the old libevent version? Will you maintain it for >>fu

Bug#570709: packaging hhvm

2013-10-24 Thread Paul Tarjan
>On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Paul Tarjan wrote: >> It wasn¹t me, but I¹m happy to take over the conversation. > Checked my sent-mail folder and it was you. The email I had is github >[at] paulisageek.com . That’s me. I checked and it came in as a notification which was filtered, sorry. >>

Bug#570709: packaging hhvm

2013-10-24 Thread GCS
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Paul Tarjan wrote: > It wasn¹t me, but I¹m happy to take over the conversation. Checked my sent-mail folder and it was you. The email I had is github [at] paulisageek.com . > Sadly, HHVM doesn¹t work on libevent 2. It was a total rewrite of the API > and doesn¹t

Bug#570709: packaging hhvm

2013-10-24 Thread Paul Tarjan
It wasn¹t me, but I¹m happy to take over the conversation. Sadly, HHVM doesn¹t work on libevent 2. It was a total rewrite of the API and doesn¹t meet our needs. Can we either: 1) distribute a libevent1.4-hhvm package with the patched .so files in /var/lib/hhvm/ 2) bundle the patched .so into hh

Bug#570709: packaging hhvm

2013-10-24 Thread GCS
Hi Paul, I think I've already contacted you or someone else from Facebook about packaging HHVM for Debian. I own the ITP with its previous name, hiphop-php . At the moment it can't be packaged for Wheezy and newer because HHVM needs a libevent patch not available for the current releases. Couldn'