On Feb 03, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> But, that's still a license. But look carefully, it says "without fee" in the
> license. I don't know if that means "you can use it without paying anyone" or
> "you can only redistribute it if you don't charge anyone".
The first meaning is the one widely accepted
"Guus Sliepen" Ecrivait:
>> So it's more some kind of errors from my side because that wasn't very
>> clear.
>> Should I update this bug to put MIT-like as license ?
>
> It's better to include the whole license if it isn't exactly equal to a
> standard license.
>
I'll update the package tonigh
"Tollef Fog Heen" Ecrivait:
> ]] Tourneur Henry-Nicolas
>
> | * License : No license, only a copyright file
>
> Surely that makes it illegal for us to distribute?
>
> --
> Tollef Fog Heen
> UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
>
>
>
Yeah but what Craig S
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 11:06:28AM +0100, Henry-Nicolas Tourneur wrote:
> > | * License : No license, only a copyright file
> >
> > Surely that makes it illegal for us to distribute?
> >
> Yeah but what Craig Small said on mentors is that looks very much like a MIT
> license - see COPYIN
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 10:37:08AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Tourneur Henry-Nicolas
>
> | * License : No license, only a copyright file
>
> Surely that makes it illegal for us to distribute?
Actually, it does have a license, which is in the COPYING file and at the top
of all t
]] Tourneur Henry-Nicolas
| * License : No license, only a copyright file
Surely that makes it illegal for us to distribute?
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a s
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Tourneur Henry-Nicolas"
* Package name: tacacs+
Version : 4.0.4.19
Upstream Author : Shrubbery
* URL : http://www.shrubbery.net/tac_plus/
* License : No license, only a copyright file
Programming Lang: C
Description
7 matches
Mail list logo
