Bug#564820: ITP: libpam-barada -- PAM module to provide

2010-02-15 Thread Andrew Pollock
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 07:10:12PM -0500, micah anderson wrote: > > Switching to that shouldn't be that hard actually, I think even easier > than working out the boring licensing issues. Either way, I'm dependent on upstream doing *something*. regards Andrew signature.asc Description: Digital

Bug#564820: ITP: libpam-barada -- PAM module to provide

2010-02-15 Thread micah anderson
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 23:26:47 -0500, micah anderson wrote: > On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 15:38:28 -0800, Andrew Pollock > wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 06:22:19PM -0500, micah wrote: > > > > > > Hey Andrew, any progress on this? > > > > It's all ready to go, I'm just waiting for upstream to make a

Bug#564820: ITP: libpam-barada -- PAM module to provide

2010-02-14 Thread micah anderson
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 15:38:28 -0800, Andrew Pollock wrote: > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 06:22:19PM -0500, micah wrote: > > > > Hey Andrew, any progress on this? > > It's all ready to go, I'm just waiting for upstream to make a release that > addresses > > E: libpam-barada: possible-gpl-code-l

Bug#564820: ITP: libpam-barada -- PAM module to provide

2010-02-14 Thread Andrew Pollock
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 06:22:19PM -0500, micah wrote: > > Hey Andrew, any progress on this? It's all ready to go, I'm just waiting for upstream to make a release that addresses E: libpam-barada: possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl and then it'll be good to go. signature.asc Descrip

Bug#564820: ITP: libpam-barada -- PAM module to provide

2010-02-13 Thread micah
Hey Andrew, any progress on this? >> it was written specifically with Android devices in mind. > There are many HOTP client out there[1]. Is it really android specific > in any way? I suggest dropping that sentence. The piece that would be put in Debian is not Android specific, but there is a

Bug#564820: ITP: libpam-barada -- PAM module to provide two-factor authentication based on HOTP

2010-01-12 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Andrew Pollock] > * Package name: libpam-barada > Description : PAM module to provide two-factor authentication based on > HOTP I would suggest that the PAM architecture is better suited to providing only _one_ factor of authentication per plugin. Does this module really implement tw

Bug#564820: ITP: libpam-barada -- PAM module to provide two-factor authentication based on HOTP

2010-01-12 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 18:22 -0800, Andrew Pollock wrote: > > * Package name: libpam-barada > Description : PAM module to provide two-factor authentication based on > HOTP > > Use HOTP (RFC4226) two-factor authentication with PAM. [..] > While this module could be used in conjunction

Bug#564820: ITP: libpam-barada -- PAM module to provide two-factor authentication based on HOTP

2010-01-11 Thread Eric Dorland
Hey Andrew, I had filed #520199 to package this ages ago but never got around to it. Please merge that bug and take this ITP with my blessing :) * Andrew Pollock (apoll...@debian.org) wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Andrew Pollock > > * Package name: libpam-barada > V

Bug#564820: ITP: libpam-barada -- PAM module to provide two-factor authentication based on HOTP

2010-01-11 Thread Andrew Pollock
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andrew Pollock * Package name: libpam-barada Version : 0.4 Upstream Author : Moxie Marlinspike * URL : http://barada.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: C++ Description : PAM module to provide two-