.. Original Message ...
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:38:58 -0400 Jonathan Yu
wrote:
>Hi Sandro:
>
>On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 23:31, Jonathan Yu
wrote:
>>> Strange, I've never seen a package name with a dot in it prior to the
>>> version
Hi Sandro:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 23:31, Jonathan Yu wrote:
>> Strange, I've never seen a package name with a dot in it prior to the
>> version number. A casual listing from:
>> $ apt-cache search . | cut -d" " -f1 | grep "\."
>>
>> doesn't
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 23:31, Jonathan Yu wrote:
> Strange, I've never seen a package name with a dot in it prior to the
> version number. A casual listing from:
> $ apt-cache search . | cut -d" " -f1 | grep "\."
>
> doesn't seem to turn anything up.
$ apt-cache -s=? search . | cut -d" " -f1 | g
Sandro:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 23:38, Jonathan Yu wrote:
>> Interesting. Of note, however, is that those packages all begin with
>> python-. Maybe something like: python-lazr.restfulclient is more
>> appropriate?
>
> Source packages names ar
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 23:38, Jonathan Yu wrote:
> Interesting. Of note, however, is that those packages all begin with
> python-. Maybe something like: python-lazr.restfulclient is more
> appropriate?
Source packages names are different from binary packages names: did
you read Python policy abo
Hi:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Owner: Luca Falavigna
> Severity: wishlist
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
>
> * Package name : lazr.restfulclient
> Version : 0.9.9
> Upstream Author : Canonical Ltd.
> * URL : ht
Package: wnpp
Owner: Luca Falavigna
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: lazr.restfulclient
Version : 0.9.9
Upstream Author : Canonical Ltd.
* URL : https://launchpad.net/lazr.restfulclient
* License : LGPLv3
Programm
7 matches
Mail list logo
