Bug#506040: Unclear licensing on some files

2010-07-30 Thread Clint Byrum
Thanks Sage, Working under the assumption that the package won't clear NEW by next week, we've been working to upload directly into Ubuntu for 10.10. It would be very helpful if you could review the comments and changes here and offer any suggestions. https://code.launchpad.net/~clint-fewbar/rev

Bug#506040: Unclear licensing on some files

2010-07-29 Thread Sage Weil
Okay, v0.21 is out. The .dsc is at http://ceph.newdream.net/debian/pool/ceph-stable/c/ceph/ceph_0.21-1.dsc Thanks guys! sage -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists

Bug#506040: Unclear licensing on some files

2010-07-28 Thread Clint Byrum
On Jul 28, 2010, at 4:09 PM, Sage Weil wrote: > On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Clint Byrum wrote: >> I've updated my branch with the latest 0.21 package plus the lintian issues >> fixed: >> >> https://code.launchpad.net/~clint-fewbar/+junk/ceph-packaging > > Is it safe to remove the build-depends on g++

Bug#506040: Unclear licensing on some files

2010-07-28 Thread Clint Byrum
I spoke too soon, I did just now notice these lintian issues, which should probably be resolved: E: ceph source: weak-library-dev-dependency librados1-dev on librados1 E: ceph source: weak-library-dev-dependency libceph1-dev on libceph1 W: ceph source: debhelper-script-needs-versioned-build-depen

Bug#506040: Unclear licensing on some files

2010-07-28 Thread Sage Weil
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Clint Byrum wrote: > I've updated my branch with the latest 0.21 package plus the lintian issues > fixed: > > https://code.launchpad.net/~clint-fewbar/+junk/ceph-packaging Is it safe to remove the build-depends on g++ and gcc entirely? sage > > On Jul 27, 2010, at 2:52 PM

Bug#506040: Unclear licensing on some files

2010-07-28 Thread Clint Byrum
I've updated my branch with the latest 0.21 package plus the lintian issues fixed: https://code.launchpad.net/~clint-fewbar/+junk/ceph-packaging On Jul 27, 2010, at 2:52 PM, Sage Weil wrote: > Hi Clint, Asheesh, > > I am about to finalize a v0.21 release. Do you mind looking at the .dsc > be

Bug#506040: Unclear licensing on some files

2010-07-28 Thread Sage Weil
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Clint Byrum wrote: > I spoke too soon, I did just now notice these lintian issues, which should > probably be resolved: > > E: ceph source: weak-library-dev-dependency librados1-dev on librados1 > E: ceph source: weak-library-dev-dependency libceph1-dev on libceph1 > W: ceph

Bug#506040: Unclear licensing on some files

2010-07-28 Thread Asheesh Laroia
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Clint Byrum wrote: On Jul 27, 2010, at 2:52 PM, Sage Weil wrote: Hi Clint, Asheesh, I am about to finalize a v0.21 release. Do you mind looking at the .dsc below and checking that everything is to your liking? I'd like to fix any packaging issues before tagging the rel

Bug#506040: Unclear licensing on some files

2010-07-28 Thread Clint Byrum
On Jul 27, 2010, at 2:52 PM, Sage Weil wrote: > Hi Clint, Asheesh, > > I am about to finalize a v0.21 release. Do you mind looking at the .dsc > below and checking that everything is to your liking? I'd like to fix any > packaging issues before tagging the release if possible. > > htt

Bug#506040: Unclear licensing on some files

2010-07-27 Thread Sage Weil
Hi Clint, Asheesh, I am about to finalize a v0.21 release. Do you mind looking at the .dsc below and checking that everything is to your liking? I'd like to fix any packaging issues before tagging the release if possible. http://ceph.newdream.net/testing/0.21/ceph_0.21-1.dsc Thanks!

Bug#506040: Unclear licensing on some files

2010-07-21 Thread Asheesh Laroia
Hi Clint, thanks a whole bundle for being careful in that review! On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Clint Byrum wrote: The package will need to be uploaded before the "FeatureFreeze" which is on August 12th. It would be best if it were ready for upload by July 29th, as that way it would be included in Al

Bug#506040: Unclear licensing on some files

2010-07-20 Thread Clint Byrum
On Jul 20, 2010, at 9:53 PM, Sage Weil wrote: > > Hi Clint, > > I'll just change the license for that file to GPL. The LGPL is used for > the rest to allow linking the client side stuff into applications, but > that's not important for fuse.cc. (And in any case, fuse.cc is mostly > unused..

Bug#506040: Unclear licensing on some files

2010-07-20 Thread Clint Byrum
Hi Sage, I've been reviewing the package, and I'm almost done. However, there are some issues with the licensing that may prevent it from entering Debian and/or Ubuntu's archive: src/client/fuse.cc has this header: /* * Ceph - scalable distributed file system * * Copyright (C) 2004-2006 Sage W

Bug#506040: Unclear licensing on some files

2010-07-20 Thread Sage Weil
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Clint Byrum wrote: > Hi Sage, > > I've been reviewing the package, and I'm almost done. However, there are > some issues with the licensing that may prevent it from entering Debian > and/or Ubuntu's archive: > > src/client/fuse.cc has this header: > > /* > * Ceph - scalabl