Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 503096 emacs-goodies-el
Bug#503096: ITP: alpaca -- GnuPG file handling for Emacs
Bug reassigned from package `wnpp' to `emacs-goodies-el'.
> retitle 503096 emacs-goodies-el: please include alpaca.el
Bug#503096: ITP: alpa
reassign 503096 emacs-goodies-el
retitle 503096 emacs-goodies-el: please include alpaca.el
thanks
On November 3, 2008 at 1:08PM +0100,
zack (at debian.org) wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 08:51:55PM +0900, Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote:
> > I don't intend to push alpaca into the Emacs main tree. Plea
>> > Hence the question goes as: considering that the next release of
>> > Debian is most likely going to be released with Emacs (>= 23.1), which
>> > is integrated properly with EasyPG, do we need alpaca in Debian? I
>> > believe the answer is «no».
>> I think that the alpaca package isn't meaning
On October 26, 2008 at 9:12PM +0900,
tats (at debian.org) wrote:
> On October 26, 2008 at 11:11AM +0100,
> zack (at debian.org) wrote:
>
> > Indeed, the fact that EasyPG is now integrated in development version
> > of Emacs is my main reason for objecting this ITP.
> [...]
> > Hence the question
On October 26, 2008 at 3:34PM +,
rswarbrick (at googlemail.com) wrote:
> > `alpaca' uses symmetric encryption with "--cipher-algo AES" for a
> > new *.gpg file by default, while I haven't found an easy way to
> > customizet EasyPG.
> >
>
> Anyway, the point of this post: gpg's default symmetri
Tatsuya Kinoshita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think that the alpaca package isn't meaningless even if less
> people use alpaca than EasyPG.
Grr. It's FEWER!
>
> `alpaca' uses symmetric encryption with "--cipher-algo AES" for a
> new *.gpg file by default, while I haven't found an easy way to
On October 26, 2008 at 11:11AM +0100,
zack (at debian.org) wrote:
> Indeed, the fact that EasyPG is now integrated in development version
> of Emacs is my main reason for objecting this ITP.
[...]
> Hence the question goes as: considering that the next release of
> Debian is most likely going to b
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:14:53PM +0900, Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote:
> > I think that a package for one single file is too much.
I agree with Luca here.
FWIW I also formally object to this ITP.
> Even so, the Debian package is helpful for users to install,
> upgrade and use it.
This is not an argu
Hi Luca, thanks for the comment.
On October 22, 2008 at 7:18PM +0200,
luca (at pca.it) wrote:
> > * Package name: alpaca
> [...]
> > * URL : http://www.mew.org/~kazu/proj/cipher/
>
> I think that a package for one single file is too much.
Even so, the Debian package is helpful fo
Hi Tatsuya!
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:58:11 +0200, Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote:
> * Package name: alpaca
[...]
> * URL : http://www.mew.org/~kazu/proj/cipher/
I think that a package for one single file is too much.
> Description : GnuPG file handling for Emacs
> `alpaca' is an Em
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tatsuya Kinoshita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: alpaca
Version : 0.13
Upstream Author : Kazu Yamamoto
* URL : http://www.mew.org/~kazu/proj/cipher/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Emacs Lisp
Description : G
11 matches
Mail list logo
