Hi Andrews,
On Fr, 21 Mai 2010, Andrew SB wrote:
> You might as well go ahead and upload now. Who knows how long it will
> take us to resolve the great VCS debate once and for all. ;-)
Done that, uploaded.
> g...@gitorious.org:sakura/sakura.git
Can you give me commit rights, username = norbusan
On Fr, 21 Mai 2010, Andrew SB wrote:
> You might as well go ahead and upload now. Who knows how long it will
> take us to resolve the great VCS debate once and for all. ;-)
Ok, will do.
> Well, honestly I'm partial to bzr, and I thought it was a good idea as
> upstream is developed in bzr as well
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Do, 20 Mai 2010, Andrew SB wrote:
>> That sounds great!
>
> Doe that mean I should wait or upload with the above changes?
You might as well go ahead and upload now. Who knows how long it will
take us to resolve the great VCS debate onc
Norbert Preining wrote:
> bzr Can we have git? Please?
I'd like to have git too.
> Honestly, I already speack cvs, svn, and a bit of git, and I don't want
> to learn another one, but if it is necessary and you prefer bzr, I am
> fine with it, no prob at all. Shouldn't be too complicated.
>
>
On Do, 20 Mai 2010, Andrew SB wrote:
> That sounds great!
Doe that mean I should wait or upload with the above changes?
> I will move the packaging branch over to proper Debian infrastructure.
> I already have an Alioth account as I maintain packages in pkg-bazaar
> and pkg-fonts, but I just appl
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi Andrews,
>
> On Do, 20 Mai 2010, Andrew Lee wrote:
>> Sure. Please feel free to do so. Or if you prefer co-maintain I am also
>> fine.
>
> See below.
>
> On Do, 20 Mai 2010, Andrew SB wrote:
>> Thanks for the review. I've uploaded a re
Hi Andrews,
On Do, 20 Mai 2010, Andrew Lee wrote:
> Sure. Please feel free to do so. Or if you prefer co-maintain I am also
> fine.
See below.
On Do, 20 Mai 2010, Andrew SB wrote:
> Thanks for the review. I've uploaded a revised package to mentors
> incorporating you suggestions.
Thanks for the
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 1:57 AM, Andrew Lee wrote:
> I'd recommend that we should add a .desktop file for the menu.
Upstream already includes a desktop file which the package installs.
Thanks!
- Andrew SB
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "un
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Di, 18 Mai 2010, Andrew SB wrote:
>> - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sakura/sakura_2.3.8-1.dsc
>
> Some comments: what about the slave x-terminal-emulator.1 man page
> in the update-alternatives call?
> update-alter
Hi Norbert,
Sorry for the relay reply.
Norbert Preining wrote:
> Then I would add a menu file in debian:
> ?package(sakura):needs="X11" section="Applications/Terminal Emulators"\
> title="Sakura" command="/usr/bin/sakura"
I'd recommend that we should add a .desktop file for the menu.
> Other
On Di, 18 Mai 2010, Andrew SB wrote:
> - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sakura/sakura_2.3.8-1.dsc
Some comments: what about the slave x-terminal-emulator.1 man page
in the update-alternatives call?
update-alternatives \
--install /usr/bin/x-terminal-emulator \
Hi all,
On Mi, 19 Mai 2010, Andrew Lee wrote:
> I think Andrew BS probably think I am blocking everyone to upload here.
>
> Actuality I'd like to have this in Debian for a long time and still will
> to have it available in Debian.
>
> However my question was does Sakura supports share one proces
Hi Andrew SB, Norbert,
Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Di, 18 Mai 2010, Andrew SB wrote:
>> If you take over the ITP, feel free to look at/use the package I've
>> been maintaining in Ubuntu.
I am glad some of you are interested on Sakura too. :)
> Oh, nice. But why don't you upload that to Debian?
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Di, 18 Mai 2010, Andrew SB wrote:
>> If you take over the ITP, feel free to look at/use the package I've
>> been maintaining in Ubuntu.
>
> Oh, nice. But why don't you upload that to Debian? As far as I see there are
> no problems to u
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Di, 13 Apr 2010, Andrew Lee wrote:
>> However, I'd love to have Sakura package in Debian if it fits the quality.
>
> So can I upload a package of sakura 2.3.8, ie take over your ITP?
If you take over the ITP, feel free to look at/use
On Di, 18 Mai 2010, Andrew SB wrote:
> If you take over the ITP, feel free to look at/use the package I've
> been maintaining in Ubuntu.
Oh, nice. But why don't you upload that to Debian? As far as I see there are
no problems to upload it as is.
I assume you know about DD and DM status, and I can
On Di, 13 Apr 2010, Andrew Lee wrote:
> However, I'd love to have Sakura package in Debian if it fits the quality.
So can I upload a package of sakura 2.3.8, ie take over your ITP?
Best wishes
Norbert
Norbert Preining
Hi Norbert, (hi others who care of Sakura in Debian),
Norbert Preining wrote:
> the last activity here was about one year ago, is there any progress?
Sorry, I didn't follow on the sakura upstream development for long. My
last in touch was too long ago, and I remember roughly as we found the
memor
Hi everyone,
(please cc)
the last activity here was about one year ago, is there any progress?
Surprisingly, you are talking about sakura 3.3.3, which the web page
I am seeing is stating 2.3.7?
Anyway, I am running my home-brewn sakura 2.3.7-0.1 and it works
nciely, and evilvte seems nice too,
19 matches
Mail list logo
