Bug#421513: sphpblog License-Question (modified/expanded GPL)

2007-05-17 Thread Ben Finney
On 17-May-2007, Cord Beermann wrote: > > You probably mean the "GNU General Public License, version 2 or, > > at your option, any later version". > > I understand that as 'choose any version of GNU (General) Public > License you want.' To be perfectly clear, this would be better written as: "..

Bug#421513: sphpblog License-Question (modified/expanded GPL)

2007-05-17 Thread Cord Beermann
Hallo! Du (Ben Finney) hast geschrieben: >Cord Beermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I want to add a package to Debian with the following >> License-Statement: > >Does this mean you are the sole copyright holder? Or is this a work >derived from someone else's work? What is the license of that

Bug#421513: sphpblog License-Question (modified/expanded GPL)

2007-05-16 Thread Ben Finney
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal as well. Cord Beermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I want to add a package to Debian with the following > License-Statement: Does this mean you are the sole copyright holder? Or is thi

Bug#421513: sphpblog License-Question (modified/expanded GPL)

2007-05-16 Thread Don Armstrong
On Wed, 16 May 2007, Cord Beermann wrote: > I want to add a package to Debian with the following > License-Statement: > > > The Simple PHP Blog is released under the GNU Public License. > > You are free to use and modify the Simple PHP