Matthew Johnson wrote:
> On Fri Jun 06 06:47, Chris Lamb wrote:
>
> > ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/git/pkg-xorg/lib/drm-snapshot
> > ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/git/pkg-xorg/driver/xserver-xorg-video-nouveau
>
> I prefer git+ssh://
As a URI or a protocol? (I thought they were synonyms.)
> after g
On Fri Jun 06 06:47, Chris Lamb wrote:
> ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/git/pkg-xorg/lib/drm-snapshot
> ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/git/pkg-xorg/driver/xserver-xorg-video-nouveau
I prefer git+ssh://
> They should appear on Gitweb in a few hours. Let me know if I've done
> anything silly; I'm not used
Matthew Johnson wrote:
> I have uploaded the packages. Next thing to do is install the packaging
> in the XSF repository, I suppose.
Done:
ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/git/pkg-xorg/lib/drm-snapshot
ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/git/pkg-xorg/driver/xserver-xorg-video-nouveau
(or)
git://git.debian.org/g
Matthew Johnson wrote:
> I have uploaded the packages. Next thing to do is install the packaging
> in the XSF repository, I suppose.
Great, thanks! I'm halfway to finishing off the repositories to follow the
XSF style. Will post again when I've pushed them (unless someone beats me to
it).
Regar
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 418889 pending
Bug#418889: ITP: nouveau -- an Open Source 3D drivers for nVidia cards
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrato
tag 418889 pending
thanks
On Mon Jun 02 14:38, Chris Lamb wrote:
> I forgot to close this ITP bug in xserver-xorg-video-nouveau's changelog; so
> I have updated both packages. They are both at the same URL.
>
I have uploaded the packages. Next thing to do is install the packaging
in the XSF repo
Christopher Halse Rogers wrote:
> > I believe these are Ready For Upload; we can get the packaging hosted
> > somewhere whilst they pause in NEW.
>
> Not quite; I've just built them, and you need to update the Source
> line in debian/control.modules.in to drm-snapshot from
> libdrm-snapshot.
D'o
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Chris Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Matt and ROAF,
>
>> So, in summary we want to use libdrm2. Have you looked at the removed
>> symbols thing?
>
> I've looked and as far as I can see the symbols seem okay, but would
> appreciate if someone else could conf
Hello Matt and ROAF,
> So, in summary we want to use libdrm2. Have you looked at the removed
> symbols thing?
I've looked and as far as I can see the symbols seem okay, but would
appreciate if someone else could confirm. The packages linked below now
generate a libdrm2 package accordingly and I'v
On 6/1/08, Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun Jun 01 04:10, Chris Lamb wrote:
...snip...
>
> > 2. Maintainer/Uploaders field
> > =
> >
> > > At the very least it should be maintained in a shared VCS and I should
> > > be added as an uploader.
> >
On Sun Jun 01 04:10, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi Matthew,
>
> > I can't see anything else obvious, I shall email debian-x and ask
> > whether it should be maintained in the XSF repositories.
>
> Excellent; I saw your post and have incorporated the following changes:
>
> * Rename source package libdr
Hi Matthew,
> I can't see anything else obvious, I shall email debian-x and ask
> whether it should be maintained in the XSF repositories.
Excellent; I saw your post and have incorporated the following changes:
* Rename source package libdrm-snapshot => drm-snapshot.
* Remove X.Org "endorsemen
On Sat May 31 00:03, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Matthew Johnson wrote:
>
> > Excellent. I shall have time tonight or over the weekend to review and
> > upload these, although I will touch base with the XSF before doing so.
>
> Sorry about the short delay.. here we go:
Cool
> These are almost certainly
Matthew Johnson wrote:
> Excellent. I shall have time tonight or over the weekend to review and
> upload these, although I will touch base with the XSF before doing so.
Sorry about the short delay.. here we go:
http://chris-lamb.co.uk/debian/libdrm-snapshot_2.3.1~git%2b20080530%2b6e8a2cf-1.dsc
On Fri May 30 07:54, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Chris Lamb wrote:
>
> > I'm would definately like to see these in experimental - it would certainly
> > ween a large number of my friends from the non-free NVIDIA driver. More
> > importantly, I'm willing to help out to make this happen.
> >
> > So what is
Chris Lamb wrote:
> I'm would definately like to see these in experimental - it would certainly
> ween a large number of my friends from the non-free NVIDIA driver. More
> importantly, I'm willing to help out to make this happen.
>
> So what is the next steps?
I have prepared some packages for
Hi,
I am currently using Christopher Rogers (roaf) nouveau packages from his
Ubuntu PPA recompiled against sid.
I'm would definately like to see these in experimental - it would certainly
ween a large number of my friends from the non-free NVIDIA driver. More
importantly, I'm willing to help out
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 17:20:56 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> To summarize, to push xserver-xorg-video-nouveau into experimental, we
> need:
> - libdrm git snapshot
drm. not just libdrm.
> - mesa git snapshot
>
> Moreover, libdrm git snapshot will generate a module source package that
> w
OoO Vers la fin de l'après-midi du dimanche 11 mai 2008, vers 16:42, je
disais:
>>> nouveau needs an up-to-date mesa (7.3.0) that we already have in
>>> Debian. It also needs an up-to-date libdrm (current git, 2.3.0 is not
>>> ok) that we don't have in Debian. Moreover, from libdrm, we
19 matches
Mail list logo
