Bug#326236: ITP: feedparser -- universal feed parser

2005-12-20 Thread Norbert Tretkowski
* Joe Wreschnig wrote: > Since I haven't gotten a response from you, I'm assuming it's okay > to hijack the ITP. Yes, go for it. Unfortunately, I don't have time for feedparser currently. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E

Bug#326236: ITP: feedparser -- universal feed parser

2005-12-20 Thread Joe Wreschnig
Hi Norbert, In investigating this ITP I ran across some licensing issues[0]; I Ccd you about that. Since then, we've contacted feedparser upstream and gotten CVS relicensed to 2-clause BSD. The documentation has also been relicensed from GNU FDL to the same. Since I haven't gotten a response from

Bug#326236: ITP: feedparser -- universal feed parser

2005-11-29 Thread Joe Wreschnig
Hey Norbert, I'm just wondering what's up with the feedparser ITP. I'm working on a couple projects that use it, and it would be great to not have to include it separately in yet another package. Is there anything I can do to help? -- Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description:

Bug#326236: ITP: feedparser -- universal feed parser

2005-09-02 Thread Norbert Tretkowski
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Norbert Tretkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: feedparser Version : 3.3-1 Upstream Author : Mark Pilgrim * URL : http://www.feedparser.org/ * License : Python license Description : universal feed parser Pyth