Bug#274451: O: metamail -- An implementation of MIME

2008-06-18 Thread Alexander Zangerl
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:27:03 GMT, Gerrit Pape writes: >Hrm, > > 23 Sep 2003: http://bugs.debian.org/212349 > 25 Mar 2006: http://bugs.debian.org/358942 > >what's _the_ tool in Debian to quoted-printable-encode files now? sorry for being, hmm, a bit behind the bleeding edge...i just revisited the m

Bug#274451: O: metamail -- An implementation of MIME Reply-To:

2007-12-12 Thread Gerrit Pape
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 03:49:43PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > metamail has been orphaned for a very long time now (in > fact, it's one of the oldest orphaned packages in Debian). I'm going > through such packages, to see if they can be safely removed from Debian, > since noone seems to care abo

Bug#274451: O: metamail -- An implementation of MIME Reply-To:

2007-12-12 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 12/12/07 at 10:27 +, Gerrit Pape wrote: > On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 03:49:43PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > metamail has been orphaned for a very long time now (in > > fact, it's one of the oldest orphaned packages in Debian). I'm going > > through such packages, to see if they can be safe

Bug#274451: O: metamail -- An implementation of MIME Reply-To:

2007-12-11 Thread Alexander Zangerl
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:52:52 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum writes: >Is there some chance that exmh will be moving away from metamail in the >near future? i've just reviewed the situation of exmh re metamail and decided that getting rid of it is the easier path. i've done that and uploaded exmh 2.7.2-12 a

Bug#274451: O: metamail -- An implementation of MIME Reply-To:

2007-12-10 Thread Alexander Zangerl
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:52:52 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum writes: >Hi Alexander, > >Since exmh is likely to become the only (or one of the only two) user of >metamail, would you be interested in adopting metamail? > >Is there some chance that exmh will be moving away from metamail in the >near future? aa

Bug#274451: O: metamail -- An implementation of MIME Reply-To:

2007-12-10 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
(Seems like you dropped several people from Cc. Re-adding them) On 10/12/07 at 10:21 +1000, Alexander Zangerl wrote: > On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 15:49:43 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum writes: > >Are you aware of the current metamail situation? Do you think it could > >be safely removed from Debian? There are st

Bug#274451: O: metamail -- An implementation of MIME Reply-To:

2007-12-10 Thread Giuseppe Sacco
Il giorno lun, 10/12/2007 alle 13.52 +0100, Giuseppe Sacco ha scritto: [...] > Currently hylafax-server depends on one executable, mimencode, but I may > change the package in order to provide a very simple alternative. [...] Ok, I read the complete bug report and I agree that this package should

Bug#274451: O: metamail -- An implementation of MIME Reply-To:

2007-12-10 Thread Giuseppe Sacco
Il giorno dom, 09/12/2007 alle 15.49 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum ha scritto: > Hi, > > metamail has been orphaned for a very long time now (in > fact, it's one of the oldest orphaned packages in Debian). I'm going > through such packages, to see if they can be safely removed from Debian, > since noone s

Bug#274451: O: metamail -- An implementation of MIME Reply-To:

2007-12-09 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, metamail has been orphaned for a very long time now (in fact, it's one of the oldest orphaned packages in Debian). I'm going through such packages, to see if they can be safely removed from Debian, since noone seems to care about them. You are receiving this mail because your name showed up s

Bug#274451: O: metamail -- An implementation of MIME

2004-12-24 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-12-22 22:03]: > > Why? It has a history of security issues and we should try to get rid > > of it. > > After having a look at various other MIME-related packages it looks > like metamail didn't do what I expected it in the first line, and > furthermore,

Bug#274451: O: metamail -- An implementation of MIME

2004-12-22 Thread Christoph Berg
retitle 274451 O: metamail -- An implementation of MIME thanks Re: Martin Michlmayr in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > retitle 274451 ITA: metamail -- An implementation of MIME > > > > I'll adopt it. > > Why? It has a history of security issues and we should try to get rid > of it. After having a look

Processed: Re: Bug#274451: O: metamail -- An implementation of MIME

2004-12-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 274451 O: metamail -- An implementation of MIME Bug#274451: ITA: metamail -- An implementation of MIME Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (a

Bug#274451: O: metamail -- An implementation of MIME

2004-12-18 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-12-18 20:55]: > retitle 274451 ITA: metamail -- An implementation of MIME > > I'll adopt it. Why? It has a history of security issues and we should try to get rid of it. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/

Bug#274451: O: metamail -- An implementation of MIME

2004-12-18 Thread Christoph Berg
retitle 274451 ITA: metamail -- An implementation of MIME submitter 274451 ! thanks Re: Jeroen van Wolffelaar in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The current maintainer of metamail, Michael Moerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > is apparently not active anymore. Therefore, I orphan this package > now. I'll adopt it.

Bug#274451: O: metamail -- An implementation of MIME

2004-10-01 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Package: wnpp Severity: normal The current maintainer of metamail, Michael Moerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, is apparently not active anymore. Therefore, I orphan this package now. If you want to be the new maintainer, please take it -- see http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index.html#howto-o for detail