retitle 264219 RM: kernellab -- RoM; no upstream, doesn't work with current
kernels
reassign 264219 ftp.debian.org
thanks
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 01:05:20PM +0300, Tommi Virtanen wrote:
> Matej Vela wrote:
> > > I'm perfectly happy with kernellab being removed from debian.
> >
> > Do you think e
Matej Vela wrote:
>>I'm perfectly happy with kernellab being removed from debian.
> Do you think enough time has passed for kernellab to be removed, or should
> we wait a bit more? (This is just a ping, I'm content to leave it as-is.)
Please remove.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Matej Vela wrote:
> Do you think enough time has passed for kernellab to be removed, or should
> we wait a bit more? (This is just a ping, I'm content to leave it as-is.)
Can we wait a bit more (say, 2 month :). If I get the time to, I want to
adopt it, but I have to do other things first.
--
A
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 09:02:13PM +0300, Tommi Virtanen wrote:
> I haven't had need or time to work on kernellab for ages, and it
> probably won't even succesfully patch a 2.6 kernel. It's a native debian
> package, so anyone who adopts it can consider themselves upstream as
> well. Ideal solut
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I haven't had need or time to work on kernellab for ages, and it
probably won't even succesfully patch a 2.6 kernel. It's a native debian
package, so anyone who adopts it can consider themselves upstream as
well. Ideal solution would be to work on improving kerne
5 matches
Mail list logo
