Bug#263870: ITA

2004-09-25 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Kalle Kivimaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-09-15 12:53]: > Not really but there are (were?) some packages which depend on version > 1.1. After I've had time to bug their maintainers to move to 1.2 > (should be a trivial dependency change in control) I'll ask for the > removal of 1.1. Sounds good, t

Bug#263870: ITA

2004-09-15 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is there a good reason to keep jakarta-log4j (version 1.1) when > version 1.2 is packaged already? Not really but there are (were?) some packages which depend on version 1.1. After I've had time to bug their maintainers to move to 1.2 (should be a tri

Bug#263870: ITA

2004-09-14 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Kalle Kivimaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-10 10:34]: > retitle 263869 ITA: jakarta-log4j1.2 - Logging library for Java > retitle 263870 ITA: jakarta-log4j - Logging library for Java > thanks Is there a good reason to keep jakarta-log4j (version 1.1) when version 1.2 is packaged already? -- Ma