On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 02:14:01PM +0100, Florian Attenberger wrote:
> I'm glad to see this, I was slightly confused that one day i saw this
> package removed, checked bug reports and didn't find anything reasonable
> about the 'why'.
So you will see it back in Debian soon, thanks for your mail!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#230121: ITP: metalog -- a modern replacement for syslogd and
klogd
Hi Martin, Martin and Adam!
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 10:19:55AM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> IMHO metalog is a nice supplement: for large and complex system you
> use syslog-ng, for simple
Adam Byrtek wrote:
- unmaintained
I'll try to maintain it better then the previous maintainer...
I'm a user of debian unstable on the desktop.
I'm glad to see this, I was slightly confused that one day i saw this
package removed, checked bug reports and didn't find anything reasonable
about
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 01:55:03AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-29 02:13]:
> > Hmmm, funny. Milan P. Stanic has set an ITA some weeks ago. Please see
>
> BTW, see #225276 for the reason why it was removed.
I see no reason there. Nevermind, looks like
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 02:13:32AM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hmmm, funny. Milan P. Stanic has set an ITA some weeks ago. Please see
> #222965 (I'm quoting the whole mail for him to see). I'm sponsoring
I didn't find it because ITAs are not listed on
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
Moreover as
Hi Gerrit!
On 2004-01-29 9:58 +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> Sure there is, see the socklog/socklog-run packages.
Oh, I did not find that because it does not provide kernel-log-daemon
and system-log-daemon. Maybe this would be a sensible addition to your
package?
Have a nice day!
Martin
--
Mart
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 10:19:55AM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> IMHO metalog is a nice supplement: for large and complex system you
> use syslog-ng, for simple environments you take metalog, which is much
> easier to configure. Besides the standard sysklogd (_this_ is the one
> which should be remov
Hi Martin, Hi Milan, Hi Adam!
On 2004-01-29 1:55 +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-29 02:13]:
> > Hmmm, funny. Milan P. Stanic has set an ITA some weeks ago. Please see
>
> BTW, see #225276 for the reason why it was removed.
Hmmm, this is the bug where
BTW, CCing me on such messages would ensure I actually see them. It
was only a coincidence I read this ITP.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-29 02:13]:
> Hmmm, funny. Milan P. Stanic has set an ITA some weeks ago. Please see
BTW, see #225276 for the reason why it was removed.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Adam!
On 2004-01-28 18:56 +0100, Adam Byrtek wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: metalog
> Version : 0.7
> Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> * URL : http://metalog.sourceforge.net/
> * License : GPL
> Desc
* Adam Byrtek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-28 18:56]:
> - obsolete & useless
> Martin or the maintainer didn't give any arguments I could discuss. I
...
>
> I'm a bit confused that it was removed from the archive without any
> real reason (as far as I know).
The maintainer didn't give me any reas
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: metalog
Version : 0.7
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://metalog.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : a modern replacement for syslogd and klogd
The metalog pack
13 matches
Mail list logo
