Bug#205681: 'which' adopotion

2004-05-25 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
reassign 205681 ftp.debian.org retitle 205681 Please remove which thanks I guess Martin forgot the (B)CC to control. Resending. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/

Processed: Re: Bug#205681: 'which' adopotion

2004-05-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 205681 ftp.debian.org Bug#205681: ITA: which -- Shows the full path of (shell) commands Bug reassigned from package `wnpp' to `ftp.debian.org'. > retitle 205681 Please remove which Bug#205681: ITA: which -- Shows the full path of (shell) comma

Bug#205681: 'which' adopotion

2004-05-17 Thread Martin Michlmayr
reassign 205681 ftp.debian.org retitle 205681 Please remove which thanks * Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-17 14:12]: > >Is anyone going to adopt this package, or would it make sense to just > >remove it? > > I think it might just make sense to remove which. Afterall, whereis does > abou

Bug#205681: 'which' adopotion

2004-05-17 Thread Sebastien Bacher
> I think it might just make sense to remove which. Afterall, whereis does > about the same function. which also exists in debianutils. 'which' as a > separate package, makes little sense to me. Seconded Cheers, Sebastien Bacher

Bug#205681: 'which' adopotion

2004-05-17 Thread Adam Majer
Martin Michlmayr wrote: * Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-03 12:23]: Are you still intending to adopt the 'which' package? * Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-03 21:29]: Sorry I renamed this to an ITP a while ago and forgotten about it. IIRC there is 2 versions

Bug#205681: 'which' adopotion

2004-05-12 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-03 12:23]: > Are you still intending to adopt the 'which' package? * Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-03 21:29]: > Sorry I renamed this to an ITP a while ago and forgotten about it. IIRC > there is 2 versions of which and I was not even sure i

Bug#205681: 'which' adopotion

2004-04-03 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi, Sorry I renamed this to an ITP a while ago and forgotten about it. IIRC there is 2 versions of which and I was not even sure if the best was to remove this one ... I'm not really interested in this package in fact, so if you want to maintain it just go

Bug#205681: 'which' adopotion

2004-04-03 Thread Adam Majer
Hi, Are you still intending to adopt the 'which' package? - Adam -- Building your applications one byte at a time http://www.galacticasoftware.com