On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 10:55:35PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-01-04 21:13]:
> > If the package has as many problems as you say it does, why be so
> > generous? Why not file against ftp.debian.org directly, requesting its
> > removal from the archive
* Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-01-04 21:13]:
> If the package has as many problems as you say it does, why be so
> generous? Why not file against ftp.debian.org directly, requesting its
> removal from the archive? As you say, Debian doesn't need hundreds of
> webmail programs.
FWIW,
Hi Andreas,
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 04:54:15PM +0100, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> Upstream ignored me since 2 years, he never implemented my fixes
> His old fashioned programming-type is out of date. IF theres a new
> upstreamversion i have to rewrite it. The only reason for me
> to make a deb was h
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-01-04
Severity: normal
Upstream ignored me since 2 years, he never implemented my fixes
His old fashioned programming-type is out of date. IF theres a new
upstreamversion i have to rewrite it. The only reason for me
to make a deb was his wap suppor
4 matches
Mail list logo
