On Thursday, May 2, 2002, at 09:40 AM, Takuo KITAME wrote:
hum. I see.
So, headers which has mozilla-dev is not enough?
What is needed?
I think that what it is looking for is the autoconf result and
Makefiles. It wants to include some Makefile stuff for the defs, and it
has a "makemaker" s
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "JG" == John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote...:
JG> On Tuesday, April 30, 2002, at 08:13 PM, Takuo KITAME wrote:
JG> > JG> built, require a "built Mozilla tree". That is, they need more than
JG> > JG> what is in the -dev package. I think it is not
On Tuesday, April 30, 2002, at 08:13 PM, Takuo KITAME wrote:
JG> built, require a "built Mozilla tree". That is, they need more than
JG> what is in the -dev package. I think it is not reasonable for us to
JG> bundle each of these with a Mozilla tree to require building. I
think
JG> that th
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "JG" == John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote...:
JG> Takuo,
JG> I respect and understand your decision to reassign this to wnpp.
JG> However, there is a larger issue -- there are many packages that, to be
JG> built, require a "built Mozilla tree".
Takuo,
I respect and understand your decision to reassign this to wnpp.
However, there is a larger issue -- there are many packages that, to be
built, require a "built Mozilla tree". That is, they need more than
what is in the -dev package. I think it is not reasonable for us to
bundle eac
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 144247 wnpp
Bug#144247: mozilla: Would be nice to include protozilla
Bug reassigned from package `mozilla' to `wnpp'.
> retitle 144247 RFP: protozilla -- Protozilla-ipc is required for things like
> enigmail
Bug#144247
6 matches
Mail list logo
