> > Is there a good reason why the super-sed enhancements are not part of
> > the regular GNU sed?
Here are them in order of importance:
1) Lack of response from the maintainer. The bug fixes (not feature
enhancements) and the Examples section of the manual were all
submitted to Ken Pizzini, and
On Tue, Dec 25, 2001 at 09:03:48PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20011225 22:40]:
> > ssed is a version of sed that supports a few new features, including
> >
> > Super sed is derived from GNU sed 3.02 and is licensed under GPL.
> > However it is not a G
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20011225 22:40]:
> ssed is a version of sed that supports a few new features, including
>
> Super sed is derived from GNU sed 3.02 and is licensed under GPL.
> However it is not a GNU project package.
Is there a good reason why the super-sed enhancements a
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A
Severity: wishlist
ssed is a version of sed that supports a few new features, including Perl
regular expressions and much greater speed than GNU sed. A few experimental
features were mutuated from Perl, including in-place editing (the `i' flag)
and the ability to
4 matches
Mail list logo
