Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 20 Oct 2001, [iso-8859-1] Jérôme Marant wrote:
>
> > Sorry, I can easily guess that the number of apron users will not exceed
> > one or two.
>
> You'd be surprised...
Maybe, trying it 5 minutes. Do you really intent to watch film with that
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Usefullness of software is not a requirement for it to be packaged. A good
> example is tuxracer in the m68k-port; It doesn't run on my Pentium I
> at 166Mhz, let alone on a Motorola 68000 processor that runs at 50Mhz.
> Still, it's compiled since it
On 20 Oct 2001, [iso-8859-1] Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Sorry, I can easily guess that the number of apron users will not exceed
> one or two.
You'd be surprised...
> This is the kind of usefullness I'm talking about. Tuxracer
> is far away from this.
I wasn't talking about tuxracer; I was
On 20 Oct 2001, [iso-8859-1] Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > * Package name: apron
> > * Version : 0.2
> > * Upstream Author : Alexander Southgate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > * URL : http://spondo
Hi Jérôme,
On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 02:20:30PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Are you serious?
Yes.
> Does Debian really need this kind of useless software?
Please define what "useless" software is. We already have dozens of
IRC clients, dozens of MP3-players, dozens of MUAs etc. etc., so whe
Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: apron
> * Version : 0.2
> * Upstream Author : Alexander Southgate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://spondooliks.org/alex/apron/apron.php3
> * License : GPL
> * Descr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: apron
* Version : 0.2
* Upstream Author : Alexander Southgate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://spondooliks.org/alex/apron/apron.php3
* License : GPL
* Description : An MPEG player running in a text-console.
It
7 matches
Mail list logo
