ity (PPPoE, VPN tunnels, etc.).
If anyone were to step up to maintain this in Debian despite this known
problem, we'd be happy to accommodate Ceni and help with its (existing)
packaging as needed.
Regards
Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
[1] Ceni doesn't deal with inet6 stanzas, wh
retitle 524403 please add support for the IguanaWorks USB IR Transceiver
reassign 524403 src:linux
found 524403 3.6.4-1~experimental.1
tags 524403 + patch
thanks
Hi
On Wednesday 01 August 2012, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Today this patch has been merged into the linux kern
n
submitted a few days ago[1], but didn't make it into 3.6.0~rc0 yet.
Feel free to contact me/ the lirc maintainer team, if you have problems
with configuring lirc for using this new kernel driver.
Regards
Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-media@vger.
rts buildable - and that's where my concerns of massive code
duplication of the full X.org 6.9 source tree return.
Yes, I'm aware of how well the NX protocol works over high latency and
low bandwidth links, but I also know how much of a nightmare it is to
work on that imake hell of the
3.5 code base rather soon? In a similar fashion FreeNX
appears to be dead upstream since November 2008 (and already was dead
way before that).
Wouldn't it make more sense to concentrate on filling the gaps to
re-use something like Red Hat's SPICE protocol for remote desktop uses?
Regards
the module
> builds fine with squeeze and sid kernels. I don't have the hardware to
> actually test it. So if someone who actually needs it wants to take over
> maintainership, he is welcome.
Regards
Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/
tain both in Debian, but I simply can't effectively
provide upstream maintenance for OpenFWWF - which prevents me from
being a responsible maintainer for it in Debian. It's a pity, but I
can't upload anything with known bugs - even if I've never noticed them
myself - to D
Hi
On Sunday 21 November 2010, Keng-Yu Lin wrote:
> 2010/11/5 Stefan Lippers-Hollmann :
> > On Thursday 04 November 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 19:21 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:
%larry.fin...@lwfinger.net>
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/dwmw2/linux-firmware.git;a=tree;f=rtlwifi
Assuming RTL8192CE support gets merged for 2.6.38, introducing a new
package providing dkms support it during a freeze might not be very
effective. Once it gets actually mer
nderstand the state-machine and having access to good signal
analyzers and wlan testing equipment - but it still just works for rev 5
core b43 cards, including ap support and noisy environments.
> Cheers,
> Onkar
Regards
Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
[1] http://www.ing.unibs.it
nd-a-half, assuming kernel >=2.6.31 + potential backports:
- working out-of-the-box, not active backporting necessary (OpenFWWF
has no declared runtime dependencies, it just needs a kernel
supporting it)
This indirectly also blocks b43-asm from being useful in the archive.
R
Package: wnpp
Owner: "Stefan Lippers-Hollmann"
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: Rene Engelhard
* Package name: openfwwf
Version : 5.1
Upstream Author : Lorenzo Nava
Francesco Gringoli
Michael Buesch
Uni
Package: wnpp
Owner: "Stefan Lippers-Hollmann"
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: "Rene Engelhard"
* Package name: b43-asm
Version : 0~20080619
Upstream Author : Michael Buesch
* URL : http://git.bu3sch.de/git/b43-tools.git
* License : GPL-
would stand a chance for Debian
inclusion. If there is a chance for this (namely a plan to get rid off
nx-X11 and a few more code contributors), I am very interested in
participating in that endeavour, but as it stands, chances for that don't
seem to be very encouraging.
> cheers,
14 matches
Mail list logo
