2010/5/20 Sebastian Dröge :
> On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 04:22 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> for me it looks as if http://bugs.debian.org/582271 and
>> http://bugs.debian.org/582286 are more or less about packaging the
>> same software. (I'm though not sure so no merge by me, just a heads
>> u
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : gsutils
Version : 2010.05.19
Upstream Author : Google
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/gsutil/
* License : Apache License 2.0
Programming Lang: C
Description : Command line tool for interacting with cloud stor
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: webm
Version : git
Upstream Author : Google
* URL : http://www.webmproject.org/
* License : BSD-style
Programming Lang: C
Description : An open, royalty-free, media file format designed for the web
WebM defin
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: google-wave
Version : hg
Upstream Author : Google Wave Team
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/wave-protocol/
* License : Apache License 2.0
Description : Google Wave protocol components
Google Wave is an onl
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Obey Arthur Liu
* Package name: zxing
Version : 1.5
Upstream Author : Google
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/zxing/
* License : APL 2.0
Programming Lang: Java, C++, ...
Description : Multi-format 1D/2D barcode
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Obey Arthur Liu
* Package name: git-fast-export
Version : 20090525
Upstream Author : various
* URL : http://repo.or.cz/w/fast-export.git
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python/C
Description : Fast import from
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Christian Perrier wrote:
> This package provides utilities for mounting and unmounting CFIS
> network file systems.
"CFIS" :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.d
Hi,
Not to be negative, but if
http://github.com/ask/billiard/blob/master/billiard/pool.py is the entire
content of this python module (and it seems to be), then this is better
suited for activestate recipes than debian packages for the time being...
Cheers
Arthur
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:05 P
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Marcus Better wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
what is the use case for Sesame in Virtuoso? IIUC Virtuoso was going to
work as a separate backend for Nepomuk (?), independent of Sesame.
From what I understand, it's a connector between
Hi,
I am currently working on the Debian packaging of Virtuoso and its
sesame interface depends on the availability of sesame in Debian.
The main project page is: https://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-virtuoso/
and the mailing list is:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-virtuoso
Hi all,
An alioth project has been created and further development will go there:
http://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-virtuoso/
There's a mailing list, please subscribe to it:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-virtuoso-maintainers
The git repository is now:
git+ssh://scm.alio
virtuoso-opensource_6.0.1~cvs20091210+dfsg2-1~exp1 is out.
Get yours at:
http://www.milliways.fr/debian/packages/virtuoso/
What's new:
- some more package splitting
- install/init script tweaking, no more errors on install/remove/purge
- replaced shipped PCRE with system PCRE, there are no more sh
Hi all,
A nepomuk-compatible snapshot of a pre-version of virtuoso-6.0.1 has been
packaged and is pullable from the usual repository:
http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/virtuoso-opensource.git
Source and binary packages for amd64 are also available here:
http://www.milliways.fr/debian/packages
Hi all,
I just pushed a new round of patches with these main changes:
- Add virtuoso-minimal virtual package and split off the core binaries in
a separate package (for kde4 use, please tell me if it's good)
- General package rename from vos-server-6.0 to virtuoso-opensource-6.0
- Fixe
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Olivier Berger
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 08:29:00PM +0200, Obey Arthur Liu wrote:
> > <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=508048>
> >
> > I set up a git repo on collab-maint with Miriam Ruiz:
> > &l
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Olivier Berger
wrote:
> Le jeudi 22 octobre 2009 à 10:09 -0700, Obey Arthur Liu a écrit :
>
> >
> >
> > I created a Google Spreadsheet. Let's conduct a full sweep of the
> > files in:
> > http://git.debian.org/?p=co
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Resul Cetin wrote:
>
> It looks like this should be fixed in the near future as kde/qt starts to
use
> it http://vizzzion.org/blog/2009/10/virtuoso-here-i-come/
Fair enough. As stated before, the only blocker now is an exhaustive
dfsg-compliance and copyright att
retitle 460817 RFP: geo-rkkda -- R. Richardson's tools for geocaching
noowner 460817
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
noowner 519234
retitle 519234 RFP: libclipsmm -- C++ interface for CLIPS
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
retitle RFP: libclipsmm -- C++ interface for CLIPS
noowner
thanks
Packaging this has been really difficult and needs cooperation from the clips
package maintainer (jfs)
Here's a mail I sent him (although I didn't get a reply at the time):
===
Hi,
I'm trying to package[1] clipsmm[2] and the up
retitle RFP: libclipsmm -- C++ interface for CLIPS
noowner
thanks
Packaging this has been really difficult and needs cooperation from the clips
package maintainer (jfs)
Here's a mail I sent him (although I didn't get a reply at the time):
===
Hi,
I'm trying to package[1] clipsmm[2] and the up
retitle RFP: geo-rkkda -- R. Richardson's tools for geocaching
noowner
thanks
I'm putting this back as RFP. This tool has since been superseded by
other tools and I don't use it anymore.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
many other issues need to be
coordinated with upstream.
Any help welcome.
Cheers
Arthur
--
Obey Arthur Liu
<http://www.milliways.fr>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
slots.
--
Obey Arthur Liu
<http://www.milliways.fr>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: wnpp
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Hi,
I'm considering rolling PacketFence on a dozen Debian servers in a few
months. Has anyone further looked into packaging PacketFence ? I suppose
I could at least help test, maybe help packaging also. With its RHEL
targeting and in
25 matches
Mail list logo
